Re: [Rd] faqs

2007-11-20 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
And one other thing. In the GNU docs it says that if your NEWS file gets too big you can create an ONEWS file for the really old stuff. Is ONEWS supported too? On Nov 16, 2007 11:12 PM, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2007 10:51 AM, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Rd] faqs

2007-11-16 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Nov 15, 2007 10:51 AM, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 15, 2007 9:57 AM, Simon Urbanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > > > > inst/NEWS would have the advantage of consistency with R itself > > > which also has

Re: [Rd] faqs

2007-11-15 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Nov 15, 2007 9:57 AM, Simon Urbanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > > inst/NEWS would have the advantage of consistency with R itself > > which also has a NEWS file. > > > > I vote for NEWS for reasons above plus because that's what I us

Re: [Rd] faqs

2007-11-15 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > inst/NEWS would have the advantage of consistency with R itself > which also has a NEWS file. > I vote for NEWS for reasons above plus because that's what I use in my packages already ;). IMHO it should be installed automatically if p

Re: [Rd] faqs

2007-11-15 Thread Gregor Gorjanc
Gabor Grothendieck gmail.com> writes: > inst/NEWS would have the advantage of consistency with R itself > which also has a NEWS file. > ... > > My vote is for inst/ChangeLog. I wote for inst/NEWS, while inst/ChangeLog can also be present to show more details such as svn log. Gregor ___

Re: [Rd] faqs

2007-11-14 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
inst/NEWS would have the advantage of consistency with R itself which also has a NEWS file. On Nov 14, 2007 10:15 PM, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14/11/2007 8:53 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > Another possibility is to just place it at the end of the vignette. > > That is wh

Re: [Rd] faqs

2007-11-14 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 14/11/2007 8:53 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > Another possibility is to just place it at the end of the vignette. > That is where it is in the proto package: > > http://cran.r-project.org/doc/vignettes/proto/proto.pdf > > Package documentation is already quite scattered and adding > a faq()

Re: [Rd] faqs

2007-11-14 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
Another possibility is to just place it at the end of the vignette. That is where it is in the proto package: http://cran.r-project.org/doc/vignettes/proto/proto.pdf Package documentation is already quite scattered and adding a faq() command would add just one more thing one has to do. Here are

[Rd] faqs

2007-11-14 Thread roger koenker
An extremely modest proposal: It would be nice if packages could have a FAQ and if faq(package.name) would produce this faq. And if, by default faq() FAQ() would produce the admirable R faq... Apologies in advance if there is already a mechanism like this, but help.se