> On Mar 6, 2020, at 9:17 AM, brodie gaslam via R-devel
> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, March 6, 2020, 8:56:54 AM EST, Martin Maechler
>> wrote:
>
>> Note that the * -> LaTex -> PDF rendered version looks a bitnicer.
>
> Ah yes, that does indeed look quite a bit nicer.
>
>> I wrote the functio
> On Friday, March 6, 2020, 8:56:54 AM EST, Martin Maechler
> wrote:
> Note that the * -> LaTex -> PDF rendered version looks a bitnicer.
Ah yes, that does indeed look quite a bit nicer.
> I wrote the function and that help page originally.
And thank you for doing so. It is a wonderful fu
> brodie gaslam via R-devel
> on Thu, 5 Mar 2020 22:18:33 + (UTC) writes:
> I've found over time that R documentation that comes off as terse at
> first blush is usually revealed to be precise, concise, and complete
> on close reading. I'm sure this is also true of `?
Trying the attachment as .txt instead of Rd.
On Thursday, March 5, 2020, 5:20:25 PM EST, brodie gaslam via R-devel
wrote:
% File src/library/base/man/findInterval.Rd
% Part of the R package, https://www.R-project.org
% Copyright 1995-2020 R Core Team
% Distributed under GPL 2 or later
\name
I've found over time that R documentation that comes off as terse at
first blush is usually revealed to be precise, concise, and complete
on close reading. I'm sure this is also true of `?findInterval`, but
for whatever reason my brain simply refuses to extract meaning from it.
Part of the proble
