Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-19 Thread Martin Maechler
> Dirk Eddelbuettel > on Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:16:25 -0500 writes: > For Pete's sake, could you please stop spamming the > r-devel list? Indeed! R-devel is reserved for people who do their homework! I've added "moderation" for Mr. Clone. Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich > We

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread Brian G. Peterson
On 07/18/2012 08:56 PM, chuckles the clone wrote: As a result, I am upgrading my ENTIRE INSTALLATION of ubuntu. In hopes that that might kick something in the broken apt-get repository and maybe I'll get a new version of R. And then please take this discussion to r-sig-debian. _

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread chuckles the clone
No, I repaired that immediately and tried again. It failed in the same way, re-installing the old version. I tried commenting out everything in the sources list except the CRAN archive and then R could not be installed. Sorry, no. I does not "just work". >From what I can tell, the initial instal

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
For Pete's sake, could you please stop spamming the r-devel list? We have a dedicated list r-sig-debian for questions related to R on Debian/Ubuntu. Please use it. And as as far as I can tell, Peter already told you what's up: deb http://http://cran.cnr.Berkeley.edu/bin/linux/ubuntu oneiric

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread chuckles the clone
Still, it would be a lot easier if there were just a version of the "spam" library that was known to work with this release of R. Has anyone successfully installed this "spam" thing? How did you do it? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/installing-spam-pack

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread chuckles the clone
I suppose since the package system is completely borked, I'll have to build from sources. But there doesn't seem to be any documentation clarifying what sources I need. r-base-core ? r-base ? r-base-dev ? Those will probably be the minimum? But are there other packages that are

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread chuckles the clone
If I comment out everything in the sources.list file *except* the cran entry, apt-get fails this way: # apt-get --reinstall -V install r-base Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reinstallation of r-base is not possible, it cannot be downloaded.

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread chuckles the clone
Well, it looks like part of the problem is that there's an r-base on us-west-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com which apt-get I suppose must be thinking is the latest. # apt-cache showpkg r-base Package: r-base Versions: 2.13.1-1 (/var/lib/apt/lists/us-west-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_oneiric_

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread peter dalgaard
On Jul 18, 2012, at 20:35 , chuckles the clone wrote: > > The line from my sources.list was cut-and-pasted from a previous suggestion. > Perhaps it is a typo? In any case, here is my entire sources.list. In that case, the obvious current suggestion is to lose the double http:// in the last lin

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread chuckles the clone
Hello! No, doing a hand-install of the spam package fails in the same way as when it is installed via installing the fields package. ie, in exactly the same way as seen in the initial post in this thread. Apparently the latest version of "spam" is incompatible with the version of R that I have i

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread Steve Lianoglou
Hello Chuckles the Clone, On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:02 PM, chuckles the clone wrote: > Thanks! But no. sources.list already contains: > deb http://http://cran.cnr.Berkeley.edu/bin/linux/ubuntu oneiric/ Could you please copy/paste your /etc/apt/sources.list file here? I guess what you wrote above

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread chuckles the clone
also, it does not help to remove and re-install r-base. as far as apt-get is concerned, version 2.13.1 is the latest. # apt-get --purge remove r-base-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: r-base-dev*

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread peter dalgaard
On Jul 18, 2012, at 20:02 , chuckles the clone wrote: > Thanks! But no. sources.list already contains: > deb http://http://cran.cnr.Berkeley.edu/bin/linux/ubuntu oneiric/ If it is actually spelled like that, that may be the cause of your problem. Fixing what needs, I see that there is indeed a

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-18 Thread chuckles the clone
Thanks! But no. sources.list already contains: deb http://http://cran.cnr.Berkeley.edu/bin/linux/ubuntu oneiric/ Re-running any sort of apt-get results in the same failure to upgrade R. Is there some way of installing a version of this "spam" library which is compatible with the version of R that

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-17 Thread Heather Turner
I expect what's happened is that you have installed R at some point, then later updated Ubuntu, which caused the R repository you had stored to be disabled. Try running sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list If my guess is right, you will probably have something like # deb http:///bin/linux/ubuntu na

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-16 Thread chuckles the clone
Thank you for your snark but it was not necessary. In fact I *have* read the "documentation". That's how I got R installed in the first place. But I followed, again, the instructions on that page and, again, I am still at version 2.13.1. (SEE BELOW) Is there some other means of causing R to upda

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-16 Thread Tobias Verbeke
Hi Chuckles, On 07/16/2012 09:05 PM, chuckles the clone wrote: No, it is R version 2.13.1 This is the latest version apt-get is getting. Is there some advanced technique for obtaining version 2.15.1 ? Have a look here: http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/ HTH, Tobias root:~# cat /et

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-16 Thread Steve Lianoglou
Hi Chuckles, On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:05 PM, chuckles the clone wrote: > No, it is R version 2.13.1 > This is the latest version apt-get is getting. > Is there some advanced technique for obtaining version 2.15.1 ? If you consider "reading the docs" as an advanced technique, then yes: http://c

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-16 Thread chuckles the clone
No, it is R version 2.13.1 This is the latest version apt-get is getting. Is there some advanced technique for obtaining version 2.15.1 ? root:~# cat /etc/motd Welcome to Ubuntu 11.10 (GNU/Linux 3.0.0-16-virtual x86_64) root:~# apt-get upgrade R Reading package lists... Done Building dependency t

Re: [Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 16.07.2012 12:44, chuckles the clone wrote: The primary error seems to be: "Creating a new generic function for "diff" in "spam" Error in setGeneric(f, where = where) : must supply a function skeleton, explicitly or via an existing function" And the full output follows. Any tho

[Rd] installing spam package is failing (spam_0.29-1)

2012-07-16 Thread chuckles the clone
The primary error seems to be: "Creating a new generic function for "diff" in "spam" Error in setGeneric(f, where = where) : must supply a function skeleton, explicitly or via an existing function" And the full output follows. Any thoughts on what may be happening and/or how to work arou