spend more time on this. I really don't mind using the
previous version.
Hello Derek,
or upgrade to R 2.5.0dev; the execution of your code snippet is not
hampered by memory issues:
sessionInfo()
R version 2.5.0 Under development (unstable) (2006-10-10 r39600)
i386-pc-mingw32
locale:
Full_Name: Derek Elmerick
Version: 2.4.0
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (38.117.162.243)
hello -
i have some code that i run regularly using R version 2.3.x . the final step of
the code is to build a multinomial logit model. the dataset is large; however, i
have not had issues in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Full_Name: Derek Elmerick
Version: 2.4.0
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (38.117.162.243)
hello -
i have some code that i run regularly using R version 2.3.x . the final step
of
the code is to build a multinomial logit model. the dataset is large;
thanks for the friendly reply. i think my description was fairly clear: i
import a large dataset and run a model. using the same dataset, the
process worked previously and it doesn't work now. if the new version of R
requires more memory and this compromises some basic data analyses, i would
label
It would be helpful to produce a script that reproduces the error on
your system. And include details on the size of your data set and
what you are doing with it. It is unclear what function is actually
causing the error and such. Really, in order to do something about it
you need to show
It would be helpful to produce a script that reproduces the error on =20
your system. And include details on the size of your data set and =20
what you are doing with it. It is unclear what function is actually =20
causing the error and such. Really, in order to do something about it =20=
you
Derek Stephen Elmerick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
thanks for the friendly reply. i think my description was fairly clear: i
import a large dataset and run a model. using the same dataset, the
process worked previously and it doesn't work now. if the new version of R
requires more memory and
Derek Stephen Elmerick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
thanks for the friendly reply. i think my description was fairly clear: i
import a large dataset and run a model. using the same dataset, the
process worked previously and it doesn't work now. if the new version of R
requires more memory and
Thanks for the replies. Point taken regarding submission protocol. I have
included a text file attachment that shows the R output with version 2.3.0and
2.4.0. A label distinguishing the version is included in the comments.
A quick background on the attached example. The dataset has 650,000
Derek Stephen Elmerick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the replies. Point taken regarding submission protocol. I have
included a text file attachment that shows the R output with version 2.3.0and
2.4.0. A label distinguishing the version is included in the comments.
A quick background
Peter,
I ran the memory limit function you mention below and both versions provide
the same result:
memory.limit(size=4095)
NULL
memory.limit(NA)
[1] 4293918720
I do have 4GB ram on my PC. As a more reproducible form of the test, I
have attached output that uses a randomly generated
Derek Stephen Elmerick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter,
I ran the memory limit function you mention below and both versions provide
the same result:
memory.limit(size=4095)
NULL
memory.limit(NA)
[1] 4293918720
I do have 4GB ram on my PC. As a more reproducible form of the test,
Derek Stephen Elmerick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter,
=20
I ran the memory limit function you mention below and both versions provi=
de
the same result:
=20
memory.limit(size=3D4095)
NULL
memory.limit(NA)
[1] 4293918720
I do have 4GB ram on my PC. As a more reproducible form of
13 matches
Mail list logo
