On 09/14/2012 07:16 AM, Jeff Ryan wrote:
Refreshing the memory on performance:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/reduce-limit-number-of-arguments-in-methods-cbind-td921600.html#a921601
short comment below...
My issue had been resolved by a more careful approach taken by timeSeries.
The other o
Refreshing the memory on performance:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/reduce-limit-number-of-arguments-in-methods-cbind-td921600.html#a921601
My issue had been resolved by a more careful approach taken by timeSeries.
The other option is wholesale deprecation of S4 ... but I won't start
that conver
> Martin Morgan
> on Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:23:02 -0700 writes:
> The methods package ?cbind2 includes the instruction to
> use via methods:::bind_activation(TRUE).
well, "instruction" only if one wants to magically enable its
use for cbind(), rbind()
> use via methods:::b
The methods package ?cbind2 includes the instruction to use via
methods:::bind_activation(TRUE). This changes the default definition of
cbind globally, disrupting proper evaluation in packages not using
cbind2. Is cbind2 a hold-over from a time when ... could not be used for
dispatch? What is a
