Aha… I think I have taken care of this.
My team just realized that a class level documentation Rd file is required… I
have created this with calls to the methods section, itemized… and we seem to
be good to go.
Thanks!
~luis
On Oct 28, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Luis Rodriguez wrote:
> Dear Duncan an
Dear Duncan and R-devel,
This advice has cleared my "checking Rd \usage sections" warning—but I am not
sure I did a good job taking your advice as I cleared this by modifying the
alias statements, but not invoking \S3method or \S4method.
Thus, I am still a bit stumped on my "checking for missi
Thanks Duncan (and othersin R-devel).
I clearly got away from this project, but I am still quite interested in
resolving this issue and getting these codes into the CRAN.
Some attempts to repair the documentation have occurred in the intervening
time, so I am including slightly updated error me
On 13-10-14 1:54 PM, Luis Rodríguez wrote:
Thanks Duncan (and othersin R-devel).
I clearly got away from this project, but I am still quite interested in
resolving this issue and getting these codes into the CRAN.
Some attempts to repair the documentation have occurred in the intervening
time
Dear R-devel,
I am a relative novice in R, but I am eager to post a new package my group
developed in CRAN, but I am stumped by a set of documentation related warnings
created by R CMD check.
So, my current plan is to recreate the documentation by religiously applying
and modifying the skeleto
On 09/09/2013 3:23 PM, Luis Rodríguez wrote:
Dear R-devel,
I am a relative novice in R, but I am eager to post a new package my group
developed in CRAN, but I am stumped by a set of documentation related warnings
created by R CMD check.
So, my current plan is to recreate the documentation by
