Re: [Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched

2006-10-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 29 October 2006 at 19:29, Peter Dalgaard wrote: | Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | | > ... unless of course all those checkins went to trunk/ aka R-devel. | | ... which "svn -r 39733:BASE" on the branch would have told you: At that point it "couldn't have" as I was quoting

Re: [Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched

2006-10-29 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... unless of course all those checkins went to trunk/ aka R-devel. ... which "svn -r 39733:BASE" on the branch would have told you: $ svn log -r 39733:BASE r39734 | hornik |

Re: [Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched

2006-10-29 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 10/29/2006 12:43 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 29 October 2006 at 10:29, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | On 28 October 2006 at 22:15, Martin Maechler wrote: > | | but no longer now. > | | [A "svn cleanup" was needed. > | | I've amended the cron-job script to do an "svn cleanup" now > |

Re: [Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched

2006-10-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 29 October 2006 at 10:29, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 28 October 2006 at 22:15, Martin Maechler wrote: | | but no longer now. | | [A "svn cleanup" was needed. | | I've amended the cron-job script to do an "svn cleanup" now | | always before "svn update". This of course is a waste of

Re: [Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched

2006-10-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 28 October 2006 at 22:15, Martin Maechler wrote: | but no longer now. | [A "svn cleanup" was needed. | I've amended the cron-job script to do an "svn cleanup" now | always before "svn update". This of course is a waste of time in | 99.9% of cases; but it's just a CPU's time, not a person

Re: [Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched

2006-10-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 28 October 2006 at 22:15, Martin Maechler wrote: | > "Dirk" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:30:38 -0500 writes: | | Dirk> On 28 October 2006 at 00:18, Peter Dalgaard wrote: | | Dirk> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | > I get the tarballs form |

Re: [Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched

2006-10-28 Thread Martin Maechler
> "Dirk" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:30:38 -0500 writes: Dirk> On 28 October 2006 at 00:18, Peter Dalgaard wrote: | Dirk> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | > I get the tarballs form Dirk> ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R and I | > D

Re: [Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched

2006-10-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 28 October 2006 at 00:18, Peter Dalgaard wrote: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | > I get the tarballs form ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R and I | > noticed that the only R-patched there is dated 2006-10-03, while R-devel is | > up to 2006-10-25. Did, by any chance, a depository for the R-

Re: [Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched

2006-10-27 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi, > > I have a question about the availability of tarballs for 2.4.0-patched. > > I routinely compile and install fresh versions of R-patched as well as > R-devel every few days. I do it mostly "for fun" but also to check for > possible build problems or problems w

[Rd] sources of 2.4.0 patched

2006-10-27 Thread apjaworski
Hi, I have a question about the availability of tarballs for 2.4.0-patched. I routinely compile and install fresh versions of R-patched as well as R-devel every few days. I do it mostly "for fun" but also to check for possible build problems or problems with my development environment (Win2000,