Re: [Rd] swig 1.3.35 & R - is the R wrapper still maintained and of interest?

2008-04-20 Thread Michael Lawrence
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Duncan Temple Lang < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | Duncan, > | > | On 20 April 2008 at 05:44, Duncan Temple Lang wrote: > | | ~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from othe

Re: [Rd] swig 1.3.35 & R - is the R wrapper still maintained and of interest?

2008-04-20 Thread Duncan Temple Lang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Duncan, | | On 20 April 2008 at 05:44, Duncan Temple Lang wrote: | | ~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from others, but am | | a little surprised to see only your two. It would seem people aren't | | using SWIG

Re: [Rd] swig 1.3.35 & R - is the R wrapper still maintained and of interest?

2008-04-19 Thread Michael Lawrence
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Duncan, > > On 20 April 2008 at 05:44, Duncan Temple Lang wrote: > | ~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from others, but am > | a little surprised to see only your two. It would seem people aren't > | usi

Re: [Rd] swig 1.3.35 & R - is the R wrapper still maintained and of interest?

2008-04-19 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Duncan, On 20 April 2008 at 05:44, Duncan Temple Lang wrote: | ~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from others, but am | a little surprised to see only your two. It would seem people aren't | using SWIG for R and I wonder why this community hasn't used or wanted AFAICT it is a classic

Re: [Rd] swig 1.3.35 & R - is the R wrapper still maintained and of interest?

2008-04-19 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 05:44 +1200, Duncan Temple Lang wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi Michael and Soeren > > ~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from others, but am > a little surprised to see only your two. It would seem people aren't > using SWIG fo

Re: [Rd] swig 1.3.35 & R - is the R wrapper still maintained and of interest?

2008-04-19 Thread Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo
Hi. I also have looked for a SWIG-R module in the recent past. However, since my use case was small enough, and given the experimental state in which I found the current R module implementation, I gave up, and coded the bindings manually. By the way, a tool like SWIG is extremely useful, as tnx t

Re: [Rd] swig 1.3.35 & R - is the R wrapper still maintained and of interest?

2008-04-19 Thread Duncan Temple Lang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michael and Soeren ~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from others, but am a little surprised to see only your two. It would seem people aren't using SWIG for R and I wonder why this community hasn't used or wanted such tools? Do we no

Re: [Rd] swig 1.3.35 & R - is the R wrapper still maintained and of interest?

2008-04-18 Thread Michael Lawrence
I am not sure what is included with swig, but have you seen this? http://www.omegahat.org/RSWIG/ I'm not sure if it's actively maintained, but at the very least it might help in your efforts at getting an R swig driver working. Michael On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:49 AM, Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL

[Rd] swig 1.3.35 & R - is the R wrapper still maintained and of interest?

2008-04-18 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
Dear all, I was trying to use the R swig wrapper with R 2.7 and shogun ( http://www.shogun-toolbox.org ) but it fails completely, as in doesn't even compile and even after patching then though compiling - crashes... So I asked on swig-users/swig-devel CC'ing the potential R maintainer but I never