Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-12 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 1/12/2007 12:04 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >> Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >>> I'd like to know one thing though - was there any specific reason for the mingw upgrade after 2.4.0, or was it just a routine latest-is-gr

Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-12 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 1/12/2007 12:04 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >> >>> I'd like to know one thing though - was there any specific reason for >>> the mingw upgrade after 2.4.0, or was it just a routine >>> latest-is-greatest upgrade? >> >> There

Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-12 Thread Brian Ripley
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >> >>> I'd like to know one thing though - was there any specific reason for >>> the mingw upgrade after 2.4.0, or was it just a routine >>> latest-is-greatest upgrade? >> >> There a

Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-12 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > >> I'd like to know one thing though - was there any specific reason for >> the mingw upgrade after 2.4.0, or was it just a routine >> latest-is-greatest upgrade? > > There are specific requirements: from the CHANGES file > >

Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-12 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > I'd like to know one thing though - was there any specific reason for > the mingw upgrade after 2.4.0, or was it just a routine > latest-is-greatest upgrade? There are specific requirements: from the CHANGES file 2.4.0: mingw-runtime >= 3.10 is requir

Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-12 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 1/11/2007 6:52 AM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >> Duncan Murdoch wrote: >>> On 1/10/2007 2:29 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: Does anybody (most probably the core team) know if there is any difference in how the official 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 binaries are built? Prob

Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-11 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 1/11/2007 6:52 AM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >> Duncan Murdoch wrote: >>> On 1/10/2007 2:29 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: Does anybody (most probably the core team) know if there is any difference in how the official 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 binaries are built? Prob

Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-11 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> On 1/10/2007 2:29 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >>> Does anybody (most probably the core team) know if there is >>> any difference in how the official 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 binaries are >>> built? >>> >>> Problem is, 2.4.0 loads with the w

Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-11 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 1/11/2007 6:52 AM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> On 1/10/2007 2:29 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >>> Does anybody (most probably the core team) know if there is >>> any difference in how the official 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 binaries are >>> built? >>> >>> Problem is, 2.4.0 loads with the wi

Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-11 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 1/10/2007 2:29 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >> Does anybody (most probably the core team) know if there is >> any difference in how the official 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 binaries are >> built? >> >> Problem is, 2.4.0 loads with the wine (I tried a few recent >> versions, and also used

Re: [Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-10 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 1/10/2007 2:29 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > Does anybody (most probably the core team) know if there is > any difference in how the official 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 binaries are > built? > > Problem is, 2.4.0 loads with the wine (I tried a few recent > versions, and also used 2.3.x under wine from time t

[Rd] wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?

2007-01-10 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
Does anybody (most probably the core team) know if there is any difference in how the official 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 binaries are built? Problem is, 2.4.0 loads with the wine (I tried a few recent versions, and also used 2.3.x under wine from time to time), but 2.4.1 won't. Thanks. Hin-Tak Leung