Thank you, Ivan for this investigation. I inspected the R changes file
(https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/NEWS.html) and found nothing
about this. I should inspect the sources too!
It could possibly break other Tcl/Tk related stuff. The doc about
Tcl_ServiceAll and Tcl_DoOneEvent
On 2/18/24 00:23, Jennifer Bryan wrote:
I've now tested with:
> R.version.string
[1] "R Under development (unstable) (2024-02-16 r85931)"
and all of the previously mentioned examples now work as expected on
macOS.
Thanks for the quick fix,
Thanks for the testing,
Tomas
Jenny
On Thu, Feb
В Tue, 20 Feb 2024 12:27:35 +0100
"webmail.gandi.net" пишет:
> When R process #1 is R 4.2.3, it works as expected (whatever version
> of R #2). When R process #1 is R 4.3.2, nothing is sent or received
> through the socket apparently, but no error is issued and process #2
> seems to be able to
On 20/02/2024 8:03 a.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I noticed the following odd behaviour today:
exprs <- expression( mean(a), mean(b), { a }, { b } )
exprs[[1]] == exprs[[2]]
#> [1] FALSE
exprs[[3]] == exprs[[4]]
#> [1] TRUE
Does it make sense to anyone that the argument
Salut Pierre,
On 20 February 2024 at 10:33, Pierre Lindenbaum wrote:
| (cross-posted on SO: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78022766)
|
| Hi all,
|
| I'm trying to compile R as a static library with the -fPIC flag so I can use
it within java+JNI (is it only possible ?), but I cannot find
I noticed the following odd behaviour today:
exprs <- expression( mean(a), mean(b), { a }, { b } )
exprs[[1]] == exprs[[2]]
#> [1] FALSE
exprs[[3]] == exprs[[4]]
#> [1] TRUE
Does it make sense to anyone that the argument passed to `mean` matters,
but the expression contained in
(cross-posted on SO: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78022766)
Hi all,
I'm trying to compile R as a static library with the -fPIC flag so I can use it
within java+JNI (is it only possible ?), but I cannot find the right flags in
'.configure' to compile R this way.
I tested various flags
On 20 February 2024 at 12:27, webmail.gandi.net wrote:
| Dear list,
|
| It seems that something changed between R 4.2.3 and R 4.3 (tested with 4.3.2)
that broke the Tcl socket server. Here is a reproducible example:
|
| - R process #1 (Tcl socket server):
|
| library(tcltk)
| cmd <- r"(
|
Dear list,
It seems that something changed between R 4.2.3 and R 4.3 (tested with 4.3.2)
that broke the Tcl socket server. Here is a reproducible example:
- R process #1 (Tcl socket server):
library(tcltk)
cmd <- r"(
proc accept {chan addr port} { ;# Make a proc to accept connections
