That was there in 1.7.0 too. Its author has been reminded.
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, kjetil brinchmann halvorsen wrote:
> I have just tried to compile this on Suse linux 7.1, and got only one
> warning; from the base package:
>
> undocumented object: manglePackageName
--
Brian D. Ripley,
I have just tried to compile this on Suse linux 7.1, and got only one
warning; from the base package:
undocumented object: manglePackageName
Kjetil Halvorsen
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
The original message was received at Tue, 3 Jun 2003 01:29:21 -0400
from byu074602wks.rn.byu.edu [128.187.254.1]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(reason: 550 unknown user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
- Transcript of session follows -
..
Please note that your email sent to ITC was not opened since it contains a virus.
Please re-send your message by mail or by fax to +41 22 7300 803.
Thank you
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 22:22:52 -0400, you wrote:
>This fails, because testing the base package uses Orthodont
>from package nlme, and so make check fails if run before
>make recommended. This should maybe be changed in this file INSTALL.
Done.
Duncan Murdoch
_
On 2 Jun 2003 at 16:53, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
Hola!
I downloaded latest of 1.7.1 today, and are compiling under windows
XP. One problem, not with the distribution but with the instructions.
The file /src/gnuwin32/INSTALL
says that one can run make check immediately after make.
This fails,
Incident Information:-
Database: g:/lotus/domino/data/mail.box
Originator: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Recipients: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:Approved
Date/Time: 06/02/2003 06:53:38 PM
The file attachment 45443.pif you sent to the recipients listed above was
infected with the W32/Sobig.dam virus
On 02-Jun-03 Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote [to r-devel]:
> "BELL David J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> No file attached??
>
> Fairly well-known virus behaviour, but did you really get it from
> r-devel? (check headers for stat.math.ethz.ch)
There seem to be no instances of the actual virus-laden
Luke Tierney wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, John Chambers wrote:
>
> > Laurent Gautier wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have quite some trouble with the package methods.
> > > "Environments" in R are a convenient way to emulate
> > > pointers (and avoid copies of large objects, or of
> > > la
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is not about princomp.default at all! That snippet of code does not
> appear there.
>
> Please do check against the S-PLUS original of biplot.default: this is in
> biplot.default. I very much doubt if you understand the intentions
> (not that
This is not about princomp.default at all! That snippet of code does not
appear there.
Please do check against the S-PLUS original of biplot.default: this is in
biplot.default. I very much doubt if you understand the intentions
(not that I do either).
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Tierney
> Sent: den 2 juni 2003 17:10
> To: John Chambers
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Laurent Gautier
> Subject: Re: [Rd] 'methods' and environments.
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, John Chambers wrote:
>
Full_Name: Andrew Irwin
Version: 1.7.0
OS: Win98
Submission from: (NULL) (165.230.175.97)
It is impossible to set both xlim and ylim in princomp or princomp.default.
For example
data(USArrests)
biplot(princomp(USArrests))
works fine, but
biplot(princomp(USArrests), xlim=c(-0.4, 0.4), ylim
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, John Chambers wrote:
> Laurent Gautier wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have quite some trouble with the package methods.
> > "Environments" in R are a convenient way to emulate
> > pointers (and avoid copies of large objects, or of
> > large collections of objects). So far, so g
Recently you sent a mail message to user "birrell" at our site, or to a
mailing list that included him or her. The message in question was:
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Your application
"birrell" is no longer at this site. While we will continue to forwa
"BELL David J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No file attached??
Fairly well-known virus behaviour, but did you really get it from
r-devel? (check headers for stat.math.ethz.ch)
> David Bell
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 June 2003
I've wrapped up the first beta release of 1.7.1. It is available on
http://cran.us.r-project.org/src/base/
Things are set up so that a new version should be generated every
morning at 7am local time (Wisconsin), until the day of the final
release. (And consequentially, although it will propagate
No file attached??
David Bell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 June 2003 13:31
To: BELL David J
Subject: Approved
Please see the attached file.
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.m
18 matches
Mail list logo
