[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Full_Name: Murray H Smith
Version: 1.7.1
OS: Windows2000
Submission from: (NULL) (202.36.29.1)
I don't see any difference either difference using win.metafile() with
its defaults on WinNT 4.0, R-1.7.1. Please start R with --vanilla and
process your code again.
On Thursday, Aug 7, 2003, at 10:14 US/Eastern, Thomas Lumley wrote:
On 7 Aug 2003, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
[[ I did discover yesterday (or maybe I was just reminded...) that we
even have nonstandard nonstandard evaluation rules in some places
(nls() seems to evaluate its model formula in the
Dear r-bugs,
It seems like the windows graphics device is having problems
recording plots when they are 5, 9, 13, ... in number. Given
temp - function(nplt)
{
if(exists(.SavedPlots)) rm(.SavedPlots,pos=1)
for(d in dev.list()) dev.off()
windows(record=T)
for(i in 1:nplt)
On 7 Aug 2003, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
[[ I did discover yesterday (or maybe I was just reminded...) that we
even have nonstandard nonstandard evaluation rules in some places
(nls() seems to evaluate its model formula in the global environment
even if it is given explicitly within a
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Marsland, John wrote:
I'm sure that many people are in the same position as me in that they are
trying to write packages and code that is vaguely future proof.
Would it be possible to get some guidance on how the R-core team see the
evolution of the base package with
