[Rd] qqnorm(*, datax=TRUE, xlab,ylab) -- S+ compatibility problem

2003-10-15 Thread Martin Maechler
Just found because an old (written for S+) function of mine did label plots wrongly with R. Example --- inspired from example(qqnorm) --- data(precip) qqnorm(precip, ylab = "Precipitation [in/yr] ...") qqnorm(precip, ylab = "Precipitation [in/yr] ...", datax = TRUE) this is all "fine" --

Re: [Rd] Infinite recursion in getGeneric (PR#4561)

2003-10-15 Thread John Chambers
John Chambers wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > setClass('foo') > > [1] "foo" > > > setMethod('is.logical', 'foo', function(x) TRUE) > > [1] "is.logical" > > > getGeneric('is.integer') > > Error in options(x) : evaluation is nested too deeply: infinite > > recursion? > > This is on

Re: [Rd] NA %*% 0 == 0 (PR#4582)

2003-10-15 Thread Uwe Ligges
Prof Brian D Ripley wrote: non-complex %*% is fundamentally done via a call to dgemm, so the answer is going to depend on the BLAS library in use. When Doug Bates introduced that version of matprod, we did discuss a bit the potential problems of cases like this. I've cross-checked, and that _is_ w

Re: [Rd] NA %*% 0 == 0 (PR#4582)

2003-10-15 Thread ripley
non-complex %*% is fundamentally done via a call to dgemm, so the answer is going to depend on the BLAS library in use. When Doug Bates introduced that version of matprod, we did discuss a bit the potential problems of cases like this. I've cross-checked, and that _is_ what is going on with my Li

Re: [Rd] NA %*% 0 == 0 (PR#4582)

2003-10-15 Thread Prof Brian D Ripley
non-complex %*% is fundamentally done via a call to dgemm, so the answer is going to depend on the BLAS library in use. When Doug Bates introduced that version of matprod, we did discuss a bit the potential problems of cases like this. I've cross-checked, and that _is_ what is going on with my Li

Re: [Rd] NA %*% 0 == 0 (PR#4582)

2003-10-15 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:06:39 +0200 (MET DST), you wrote: >R-1.8.0: Does not happen for me on WindowsNT4.0 either (self compiled >binary, gcc-3.3.1). > > >> Does for me (RedHat, R 1.8.0 and 1.7.0). > > >I guess the problem is compiler-dependend, because I get that "0" in a >self-compiled R-1.7.1

Re: [Rd] help.search in trouble with R-patched ?

2003-10-15 Thread Laurent Gautier
I just closed my R session, ran it again... and then it worked... the only difference (of possible interest) I have found between the two sessions is that in the first one, the package reposTools did: Synching your local package management information ... Packages which have been added/updated:

Re: [Rd] NA %*% 0 == 0 (PR#4582)

2003-10-15 Thread ligges
Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote: > Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >>>Full_Name: J . R. M. Hosking >>>Version: 1.8.0 >>>OS: Windows 2000 >>>Submission from: (NULL) (129.34.20.23) >>> >>> >>>On R 1.8.0 (and on R 1.5.1), Windows binary: >