Full_Name: Yongchao Ge
Version: 1.8
OS: Windows XP profesional
Submission from: (NULL) (146.203.2.152)
The R installation is fine on Windows XP, but when I started to open the R
program, then it pops out this message:
"R for Windows GUI front-end has encountered a problem and needs to close. We
Hi,
When using Rdconv to convert R documentation to S-PLUS SGML documentation,
the \name{} is converted to but the \alias{}es are not. Below is a
(crude) patch to fix this problem:
Compare: (<)D:\Apps\R\R-1.8.0\share\perl\R\Rdconv.pm.orig (88302 bytes)
with: (>)D:\Apps\R\R-1.8.0\share\perl\R\
Full_Name: Hsiu-Khuern Tang
Version: 1.8.0
OS: GNU/Linux (Debian unstable)
Submission from: (NULL) (156.153.255.243)
Hi,
I use palette(rgb(red=..., green=..., blue=..., names=mycolors)) to define my
own color palette. After doing this, the names `mycolors' are not stored in
palette() anymore
You may think this is ridiculous, but here's the situation I'm thinking
about.
Students are trying (e.g.) to evaluate a likelihood for a series of
parameter values, and want to store the results in a vector, e.g.:
pvec = seq(0,10,by=0.1)
likvec = numeric(length(pvec))
They try something
> Peter Kleiweg writes:
> # aldus Kurt Hornik :
>> > I am trying to configure R-1.8.0-patched (fresh rsync) for machines
>> > with the tcltk files in unorthodox locations. I specified a
>> > TCLTK_CPPFLAGS='/usr/freeware/include/' in the file config.site but it
>> > seems that a '# no special
I suspect that it would break too much existing code to make all
subscripting behave in a "strict" manner. However, I wonder if it would be
possible to use namespaces and packages to make a particular package get
strict versions of subscripting operators? It would have to be done in
such a wa
You would need at least a fuzz for computed indices being slightly
non-integer (although the calling code should do that).
I can think of several cases where the implicit floor() is convenient.
Can you tell me of examples where users would do this by accident (or out
of non-RTFM)?
On Tue, 28 Oc
Tony Plate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose adding "strict" versions of the subsetting operators "[",
> "[[", and "$" to the R language.
Interesting idea, Tony! I think you're addressing 3 somewhat distinct
problems; here's how I deal with them currently:
1) Partial string matchi
On a related topic: is there any chance/any interest in a slight
modification of the subsetting code that would generate a warning when the
user tried to subset with a non-integer? The current behavior is that the
non-integer is coerced to an integer, which means that e.g. x[3.8] is
equival
