Re: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

2003-12-12 Thread Luke Tierney
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Paul Gilbert wrote: > If I understand this change correctly, I think is wrong for R-core to > think it is a small change. It has much more serious consequences for me > than any changes introduced R 1.0. It definitely should not be > introduced at a dot level release unle

[Rd] A christmas gift for you rtfeb ybksj (PR#5734)

2003-12-12 Thread dnp0uocoin
--76_91.FB28F_3C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQpIaSwNCg0KR3JlYXQgcmF0ZXMgZm9yIHRoZSBob2xpZGF5cyEgDQoNClJlZmluYW5jZSB0 b2RheSB0byBhcyBsb3cgYXMgMi45NSUhDQpTYXZlIHRob3VzYW5kcyBvZiBkb2xsYXJzIG9y IGJ1eSB0aGUgDQpob21lIG9mIHlvdXIgZHJlYW1zIQ0KDQp

Re: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

2003-12-12 Thread Paul Gilbert
If I understand this change correctly, I think is wrong for R-core to think it is a small change. It has much more serious consequences for me than any changes introduced R 1.0. It definitely should not be introduced at a dot level release unless there is a fairly simple mechanism to deal wit

Re: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

2003-12-12 Thread Paul Gilbert
Henrik Thanks for the suggestion. I am not sure that I have sufficient control over the functions that make an object Ttframed. I will have to explore a bit further to know that, and I am about to get on a plane so it will be awhile before I have a chance to do that. My first reaction is to ag

RE: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

2003-12-12 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilbert > Sent: den 12 december 2003 16:20 > To: Prof Brian Ripley > Cc: Paul Gilbert; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution > > > Prof Brian Ripl

Re: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

2003-12-12 Thread Paul Gilbert
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Paul Gilbert wrote: Prof Brian Ripley wrote: There are a small number of CRAN packages that attempt to modify system functions and so will need updating. (Known examples are in dse:tframe, gregmisc and mclust and some testing code elsewhere.

Re: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

2003-12-12 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Paul Gilbert wrote: > Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > > >There are a small number of CRAN packages that attempt to modify system > >functions and so will need updating. (Known examples are in dse:tframe, > >gregmisc and mclust and some testing code elsewhere.) > > > Brian > > Wh

Re: [Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

2003-12-12 Thread Paul Gilbert
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: There are a small number of CRAN packages that attempt to modify system functions and so will need updating. (Known examples are in dse:tframe, gregmisc and mclust and some testing code elsewhere.) Brian What do you mean by "updating?" In tframe I modify a few functions

Re: [Rd] Failed installation on Mac OSX 10.3 (PR#5697)

2003-12-12 Thread stefano iacus
We are probably both right as the readme.txt file says You should also install the other three packages: 1. libreadline (unless you have this package already installed) 2. tcltk (this is a must if you want to use tcltk) 3. libxml2 (if you want to use the XML package) stefano On Venerdì, dic 12, 20

Re: [Rd] Failed installation on Mac OSX 10.3 (PR#5697)

2003-12-12 Thread Brian Beckage
I did read the readme.txt but it said you 'should' install the libreadline so my impression was that it was recommended but not necessary. Undoubtedly, an oversight on my part. Brian On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, stefano iacus wrote: > You should read the readme.txt file which says that you have to in

Re: [Rd] Bug in pbinom? (PR#5727)

2003-12-12 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Oh, come on: have you never heard of the Poisson approximation? > ppois(1, 1.95*seq(1.02,1.03,10^-3), lower=F,log=T) [1] -0.5259247 -0.5250276 -0.5241321 -0.5232383 -0.5223462 -0.5214557 [7] -0.5205669 -0.5196798 -0.5187943 -0.5179104 -0.5170282 Probably you believe that computers never make er

Re: [Rd] legend() graphics output bug (PR#5725)

2003-12-12 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Full_Name: Daniel Gasser > > Version: 1.8.1 > > OS: Win XP > > Submission from: (NULL) (130.60.20.92) > > > > > > The legend()-Function shows a different behaviour than it did in Version 1.6.1. > > It plots a black box l

Re: [Rd] legend() graphics output bug (PR#5725)

2003-12-12 Thread ligges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Daniel Gasser > Version: 1.8.1 > OS: Win XP > Submission from: (NULL) (130.60.20.92) > > > The legend()-Function shows a different behaviour than it did in Version 1.6.1. > It plots a black box left of the legend lines on each legend row. In 1.6.1 there > was

[Rd] Bug in pbinom? (PR#5727)

2003-12-12 Thread liebscher
Dear colleagues, the command pbinom(size=1.95*10^10,prob=seq(1.02,1.03,10^-3)*10^-10,q=1,lower=F,log=T) produced the output [1] -46.0120973 -46.0101369 -46.0081784 -46.0062239 -46.0042692 -46.0023165 [7] -0.5205666 -0.5196801 -0.5187944 -0.5179102 -0.5170278 what seems strange. Has t

[Rd] legend() graphics output bug (PR#5725)

2003-12-12 Thread gasser
Full_Name: Daniel Gasser Version: 1.8.1 OS: Win XP Submission from: (NULL) (130.60.20.92) The legend()-Function shows a different behaviour than it did in Version 1.6.1. It plots a black box left of the legend lines on each legend row. In 1.6.1 there was just the line in appropriate color for eac

Re: [Rd] bug + insufficient doc in R CMD INSTALL (PR#5703)

2003-12-12 Thread Kurt Hornik
> dpierce writes: > Hello, > I believe I have found a bug in the R INSTALL script > (src/scripts/INSTALL.in). The problem comes up when a user tries to > specify more than one "--config-args" (or, I imagine, "--config-vars") on > the R CMD INSTALL line. In such a case, no error message is gen