__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
--qwvxshtkdbemdyansmfp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--qwvxshtkdbemdyansmfp
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="bab.zip"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dadbcadcdd.zip"
UEsDBAoA
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Marsland, John wrote:
>
> > Is you project based upon the SJava package, because we have had lots
> > of
> > problems with the callback interface?
>
> No, we are not using SJava for obvious reasons. I tried hard to fix it
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Paul Gilbert wrote:
[...]
> >>This would conflict (and override?) the
> >>S3 generic in base, which I don't think is allowed in 1.9.0. Until
> >>recently I have been overriding the start function in base (and some
> >>others) with my own S3 generic, and have just gone thr
Dear Prof. Ripley,
Thank you for reminding me to the possibility to place the dots as first
argument.
If this is the solution against partial argument matching, we e.g. cannot
safely define a plot method which gives a demo plot in case of no object
(because we have to obey the class paramter conv
Clearly, I disagree in some areas. But you raise an interesting, but perhaps
unintended, question:
Do we think that R is a programming language in its own right where we seek
to develop code and then build on that code for example in a object oriented
way?
Or, is R a mechanism for combining lots
On 27 Feb 2004, Douglas Bates wrote:
> Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > "PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > on 26 Feb 2004 15:44:16 +0100 writes:
> >
> > PD> Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> Have you tried configuring R with Got
"Marsland, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Clearly, I disagree in some areas. But you raise an interesting, but perhaps
> unintended, question:
>
> Do we think that R is a programming language in its own right where we seek
> to develop code and then build on that code for example in a object
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Swinton, Jonathan wrote:
From: Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Rd] package 'stats' needs import directive for 1.9.0?
To: "Heywood, Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I suggest you don't try: there are alr
La dirección utilizada no existe en este servidor. Verifique la dirección email a la
cual está enviando el mensaje.
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > on 26 Feb 2004 15:44:16 +0100 writes:
>
> PD> Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Have you tried configuring R with Goto's BLAS
> >> http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kgo
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Swinton, Jonathan wrote:
From: Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Rd] package 'stats' needs import directive for 1.9.0?
To: "Heywood, Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Paul Gilbert wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Swinton, Jonathan wrote:
> >
> >From: Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: [Rd] package 'stats' needs import directive for 1.9.0?
> >To: "Heywood, Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: [EMAI
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Swinton, Jonathan wrote:
> > From: Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Rd] package 'stats' needs import directive for 1.9.0?
> > To: "Heywood, Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ...
> > I suggest you don't try: there are already quite a f
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Swinton, Jonathan wrote:
>
>
> > From: Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Rd] package 'stats' needs import directive for 1.9.0?
> > To: "Heywood, Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ...
> > I suggest you don't try: there are already q
> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on 26 Feb 2004 15:44:16 +0100 writes:
PD> Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Have you tried configuring R with Goto's BLAS
>> http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kgoto/
>>
>> I haven't worked with Opteron or Athlo
"Marsland, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, lots of packages do use C/Fortran code ... it would be great if there
> were more packages that are "pure R" especially since the advent of S4
> classes and namespaces.
Even with those, quite often we have to move code to C/C++/Fortran for
effic
> From: Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Rd] package 'stats' needs import directive for 1.9.0?
> To: "Heywood, Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
> I suggest you don't try: there are already quite a few 1.9.0-specific
> versions of packages on CRAN, and
Yes, lots of packages do use C/Fortran code ... it would be great if there
were more packages that are "pure R" especially since the advent of S4
classes and namespaces.
Is it worth suggesting that we create a designation "pure R" for packages
that have no external source code and encourage more o
[Moved to R-devel, as that is where `wishlist' items fit best.]
It is not currently possible. Furthermore, the R base code is riddled
with uses of partial argument matching (check out the uses of rep(), for
example) and partial list matching, although from time to time I try to
eradicate a bunch
A possible regex bug when working with large strings. The
following code snippet
t5 <- paste( c( "# === TEST", rep(' ', 2452294) ), collapse='')
str( sub("^.*TEST", "xyz", t5) )
str( sub("^.*TEST", "xyz", substr(t5,0,200)) )
doesn't behave right; on one machine, the second and third
lines
25 matches
Mail list logo