Jeffrey Horner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good point. However, I chose this route to 1) understand R and its
> internals, which is more complicated than I thought, 2) write an
> apache module, which I've always wanted to do, and 3) leverage
> Apache's robust server technology. In my opinion, n
Warnes, Gregory R wrote:
Jeff,
Does apache use threads? If it does, I would recommend *not* directly
putting R into the apache server for the simple reason that R is not
thread-safe.
Apache 1.3 doesn't use threads, and Apache 2.0 doesn't have to use
threads. Both are still actively maintained by
I noticed in the extension manual that the \author{} entry should refer
to the author of the Rd file and not the code documented. I had always
interpreted it as the author of the code, not the documentation. I
wonder if others also find this ambiguous. Its generally not an issue,
except when there
"Warnes, Gregory R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There appears to be no "is.formula()" function in R-1.9.1. May I suggest
> that
>
> is.formula <- function(x) inherits(x, "formula")
>
> be added to base, since formula is a fundimental R type?
why not just
is(x,"formula")
?
best,
There appears to be no "is.formula()" function in R-1.9.1. May I suggest
that
is.formula <- function(x) inherits(x, "formula")
be added to base, since formula is a fundimental R type?
Gregory R. Warnes
Manager, Non-Clinical Statistics
Pfizer Global Research and Development
LEGAL NOT
Multi-threaded: No
Parallel: *Explicit* parallelism is supported if you use one of the
parallel libraries: rpvm, rmpi. The snow libraray provides a nice wrapper
for both / either of these.
-Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Liao,
Jeff,
Does apache use threads? If it does, I would recommend *not* directly
putting R into the apache server for the simple reason that R is not
thread-safe.
You might find it simpler (and cleaner) to use the RSOAP
(http://rsoap.sf.net) interface to connect R with apache. I originally
created
One of the changes some packages are noticing from the recent
modifications to methods is warnings of "undefined classes" during
installation when the package extends S3 classes or uses them as slots
UNLESSS they have been declared in a setOldClass() call. The green book
"strongly recommends" dec
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, David Brahm wrote:
> My "g.data" contributed package fails under R-devel. g.data creates minimal
> packages which consist only of a "DESCRIPTION" file and the "R" and "data"
> subdirectories, but .find.package() now rejects them because the DESCRIPTION
> file lacks a "Version
> My question is, what else is necessary for a minimal package? "Writing R
> Extensions" states:
>"The `Package', `Version', `License', `Description', `Title', `Author',
> and `Maintainer' fields are mandatory..."
> So should I really add all these (superfluous) fields, to avoid future
> r
My "g.data" contributed package fails under R-devel. g.data creates minimal
packages which consist only of a "DESCRIPTION" file and the "R" and "data"
subdirectories, but .find.package() now rejects them because the DESCRIPTION
file lacks a "Version" field. I will fix g.data to add a "Version" fi
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is a mistake at your own department's site, but not in the current R
> sources. It seems those docs are from R 1.2.2! Even R 1.6.2 has the
> correct formula.
>
> Please ask whoever maintains that site to correct it, and don't expect the
> R
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is a mistake at your own department's site, but not in the current R
> sources. It seems those docs are from R 1.2.2! Even R 1.6.2 has the
> correct formula.
>
> Please ask whoever maintains that site to correct it, and don't expect the
> R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> There is a mistake on the "Weibull Distribution" (base package) help
> page in the online docs (http://docs.stat.ufl.edu/R/doc/html/). The
> formula for Var(X) should have Gamma(1 + 1/a)^2 in place of Gamma(1 + 1/a).
Looks like docs.stat.ufl.edu haven't been updated
That is a mistake at your own department's site, but not in the current R
sources. It seems those docs are from R 1.2.2! Even R 1.6.2 has the
correct formula.
Please ask whoever maintains that site to correct it, and don't expect the
R team to fix problems in 3.5 year old versions of R.
On We
There is a mistake on the "Weibull Distribution" (base package) help
page in the online docs (http://docs.stat.ufl.edu/R/doc/html/). The
formula for Var(X) should have Gamma(1 + 1/a)^2 in place of Gamma(1 + 1/a).
--
Alex Trindade
Assistant Professor of Statistics
University of Florida
http://ww
16 matches
Mail list logo
