[Rd] Is this a problem with methods??

Dear R-devel list members, we have developed a package and it works perfect in R 1.9.1 but when we prooved with R-devel we get the next output from the R CMD check: Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : couldn't find function "@<-" Execution halted ERROR: installing package indices failed ** Remo

RE: [Rd] R as shared library

>From: A.J. Rossini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Jeffrey Horner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Good point. However, I chose this route to 1) understand R and its >> internals, which is more complicated than I thought, 2) write an >> apache module, which I've always wanted to do, and 3) leverage

Re: [Rd] mtext adj= wrong with several las= (PR#7188)

> No, adj moves not always along the axis: No, not yet. But mtext logically is oriented relative to its axis. And it should behave consistently relative to its axis. Whichever solution is choosen finally, I think it is important, that the default parametrisation will handle multi-line labels su

[Rd] How to enable ANSII C checking?

Hi! I have run R CMD check on a package on Windows 2000, Linux (Debian), Linux Mandrake. On all of this platforms the check runs without any warning. I send the package to a colleague. He runs R CMD check on his machine and gets errors eg. mscalibD.c:161: syntax error before `int' mscalibD.c:16

Re: [Rd] mtext adj= wrong with several las= (PR#7188)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Uwe, Thanks for your mail. I see it different: yes, Left / right adjustemnt seems to be perfectly OK. But at axis 1 with las=1, it's not Left / right adjustement what is needed here. Here the text needs to be right adjusted, and the (one) adj= par should determine the ve

Re: [Rd] mtext adj= wrong with several las= (PR#7188)

Hi Uwe, Thanks for your mail. I see it different: yes, Left / right adjustemnt seems to be perfectly OK. But at axis 1 with las=1, it's not Left / right adjustement what is needed here. Here the text needs to be right adjusted, and the (one) adj= par should determine the vertical alignment. It

Re: [Rd] No is.formula()

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Martin Maechler wrote: > > "tony" == A J Rossini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > on Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:33:23 -0700 writes: > > tony> "Warnes, Gregory R" > tony> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> There appears to be no "is.formula()" function in > >> R-1.9.

Re: [Rd] No is.formula()

> "tony" == A J Rossini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:33:23 -0700 writes: tony> "Warnes, Gregory R" tony> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> There appears to be no "is.formula()" function in >> R-1.9.1. May I suggest that >> >> is.formula <- functio