> "DeepS" == Deepayan Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:54:52 -0500 writes:
DeepS> Before it's too late for R 2.0.0, do we have a final decision yet on
DeepS> having a reorder method for "factor" in stats?
Since the thread is quite a bit old, (and I have bee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Tom Short
> Version: 1.9.1
> OS: Win2000 & Debian
> Submission from: (NULL) (64.65.255.41)
>
>
> WISHLIST:
>
> axis() has a default parameter of "lwd = 1". I want skinnier lines as the
> default. If I change the default lty, it doesn't change what axis uses
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My second question is:
>
> if I do use the R replacements, what are their names nowadays?
> R-EXTS refers to Calloc, Realloc and Free, but these aren't exported by
> R.DLL (for R1.9.0 or 1.9.1) and I couldn't find mention of any name
> change in th
Dear R-devel
This one seems a bit arcane for R-help. I very often use R to call routines written in
Delphi (son of Pascal), doing "persistent" memory allocation within Delphi. That is, I
start R and load the Delphi DLL; then I use .C to call a Delphi routine which
allocates a piece of memory X
Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (original posting with quick workaround
> > http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/04/07/1778.html)
>
> Could well be fix, not just workaround Given that optim wasn't
> designed to be able to hold arguments constant, any fix is going to be
> some
Thanks, I'm sure our users will welcome it.
This is also the fastest bug response I've ever seen on any software,
and much appreciated.
GTK
>-Original Message-
>From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:14 PM
>To: Tucker-Kellogg, Gregory
>C
I am seeing NaNs, which is more sensible.
We will add a test for stderr small compared to the larger group mean.
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Tucker-Kellogg, Gregory wrote:
>
> My apologies for not including the transcript in the original message:
>
> > xx <- rep(2.10,80)
> > groups.balanced <- as.fac
My apologies for not including the transcript in the original message:
> xx <- rep(2.10,80)
> groups.balanced <- as.factor(c(rep("one",40),rep("two",40)))
> groups.unbalanced <- as.factor(c(rep("one",44),rep("two",36)))
> t.test(xx ~ groups.balanced)
Welch Two Sample t-test
data: xx by
What are you seeing here? I get identical results in the two cases.
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> # users would benefit from a warning about the behavior in the
> # groups.unbalanced case below. A propogation of difference is the variance
> # calculation is leading to an app
Before it's too late for R 2.0.0, do we have a final decision yet on
having a reorder method for "factor" in stats?
Deepayan
On Friday 03 September 2004 11:36, Warnes, Gregory R wrote:
> I also have a reorder.factor defined in the gregmisc package. It has
> a slighly different behavior.
> It a
This is deliberate, as processing can take a long time and we don't
want to lock R whilst a printer prints a file for example.
Just insert a sleep(1).
It certainly is not a bug, as no one said you would be able to access a
file immediately.
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_N
# users would benefit from a warning about the behavior in the
# groups.unbalanced case below. A propogation of difference is the variance
# calculation is leading to an apparently significant difference in
# means, even though the numeric values are all identical. Obviously upon
# inspection th
Full_Name: Tom Short
Version: 1.9.0
OS: Win2000
Submission from: (NULL) (64.65.255.41)
POSSIBLE WISHLIST, POSSIBLE BUG:
The following code works on Debian, but fails on Windows 2000 with 'Error in
file("test.png", "r") : unable to open connection':
bitmap("test.png")
plot(c(1,2,3))
dev.off()
x
Full_Name: Tom Short
Version: 1.9.1
OS: Win2000 & Debian
Submission from: (NULL) (64.65.255.41)
WISHLIST:
axis() has a default parameter of "lwd = 1". I want skinnier lines as the
default. If I change the default lty, it doesn't change what axis uses.
The following code produces a graph with a
"Daniel Hoppe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> This is a repost of an earlier message (with a clearer example
> demonstrating the problem I ran into). If you run the mle example in
> stats4
> This happens because optim gets the old ndeps but just one variable to
> optimize. The optim e
We are currently on R 2.0.0 alpha. If you submit a bug fix, preferably
this week and at the latest next week, it will be considered for 2.0.0.
Please take seriously that R is an open project and does not have `staff'
to fix bugs. If you think it is worth fixing, please fix it for us
by providi
Hi!
This is a repost of an earlier message (with a clearer example
demonstrating the problem I ran into). If you run the mle example in
stats4
library(stats4)
x <- 0:10
y <- c(26, 17, 13, 12, 20, 5, 9, 8, 5, 4, 8)
ll <- function(ymax=15, xhalf=6)
-sum(stats::dpois(y,
17 matches
Mail list logo
