Re: [Rd] bug in power.t.test( ) (PR#7245)

2004-09-23 Thread ligges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Mai Zhou > Version: 1.9.1 > OS: Win XP Professional > Submission from: (NULL) (12.222.227.93) > > > >>power.t.test(n=25, delta=0.1, sig.level=1.1, strict=TRUE, type="one.sample") > > > One-sample t test power calculation > > n = 25 >

[Rd] bug in power.t.test( ) (PR#7245)

2004-09-23 Thread mai
Full_Name: Mai Zhou Version: 1.9.1 OS: Win XP Professional Submission from: (NULL) (12.222.227.93) > power.t.test(n=25, delta=0.1, sig.level=1.1, strict=TRUE, type="one.sample") One-sample t test power calculation n = 25 delta = 0.1 sd = 1 sig.le

Re: [Rd] Cannot build cluster_1.9,6 under R 2.0.0 beta Sep 21

2004-09-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
And another follow-up -- this may well be related to cluster as mgcv-1.1.2 builds fine. Dirk -- Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others. -- Groucho Marx __ [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Rd] Cannot build cluster_1.9,6 under R 2.0.0 beta Sep 21

2004-09-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:58:58PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Doing the normal build process [1] for a first time with a R 2.0.0 snapshot > -- the Sep 21 version I uploaded to Debian's 'experimental' section two days > ago, ended in failure. The package in question is cluster 1.9.6 which sho

[Rd] Cannot build cluster_1.9,6 under R 2.0.0 beta Sep 21

2004-09-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Doing the normal build process [1] for a first time with a R 2.0.0 snapshot -- the Sep 21 version I uploaded to Debian's 'experimental' section two days ago, ended in failure. The package in question is cluster 1.9.6 which should be 2.0.0-ready. The (partial) log follows:

[Rd] algorithm reference for sample()

2004-09-23 Thread Vadim Ogranovich
Hi, Don't know if it belongs to r-devel or r-help, but since I am planning to alter some of R's internal code I am sending it here. The existing implementation of the sample() function, when the optional 'prob' argument is given, is quite inefficient. The complexity is O(sampleSize * universeSi

Re: [Rd] noncentrality paramter in power.anova.test (PR#7244)

2004-09-23 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Full_Name: > Version: 1.9.0 > OS: Windows XP > Submission from: (NULL) (134.126.93.191) > > > I believe the noncentrality parameter, lambda, in power.anova.test is incorrect. > The noncentrality paramter is defined as lambda <- (groups - 1) * n * > (between.var/withi

[Rd] Rgraphviz + graphviz 1.12.1 compilation error

2004-09-23 Thread Saurin Jani
Hi, I have Linux Fedora 32 bit with 512 RAM I would like to use Rgraphviz package.so, I did: $ [EMAIL PROTECTED] packages]# rpm -i graphviz-1.12-1.i386.rpm package graphviz-1.12-1 is already installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] packages]# R CMD INSTALL -l /usr/local/lib/R/library Rgraphviz_1.4.0.tar

[Rd] noncentrality paramter in power.anova.test (PR#7244)

2004-09-23 Thread meyerjp
Full_Name: Version: 1.9.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (134.126.93.191) I believe the noncentrality parameter, lambda, in power.anova.test is incorrect. The noncentrality paramter is defined as lambda <- (groups - 1) * n * (between.var/within.var). The n should not be there. The functi

[Rd] browser() is called incidentally (?) somewhere from inside methods::as

2004-09-23 Thread Wolski
Hi, Executing the following code causes the prompt to enter browser() mode. >dd<-as(Npatrick1,"list") Called from: as(Npatrick1, "list") Browse[1]> R : Copyright 2004, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.0.0 beta (2004-09-20), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 Some addtitional info about Npa

Re: [Rd] Rgraphviz compilation error

2004-09-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 01:11:35PM -0700, Saurin Jani wrote: [...] > I have installed graphviz version: > graphviz-1.16-1.src.rpm installed already on system. [...] > $ R CMD INSTALL -l /usr/local/lib/R/library > Rgraphviz_1.4.0.tar.gz [...] > make: *** [Rgraphviz.o] Error 1 > ERROR: compila

Re: [Rd] attaching to position 1

2004-09-23 Thread Martin Maechler
> "PatBurns" == Patrick Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:30:10 +0100 writes: PatBurns> If an attempt is made to attach to position 1, it PatBurns> appears to work (not even a warning) but in fact PatBurns> it doesn't work as many would expect. "search"