Re: [Rd] 2.0.1 buglets

2004-11-04 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Peter Dalgaard writes: > Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > > but everything seems to configure and make ok. Should this message be >> > > expect or is this a bug? >> > >> > It is unexpected. Is it new in 2.0.1 beta? You have told us your kernel, >> > not your distro. This

Re: [Rd] covariance bug (PR#7342)

2004-11-04 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Please do read the posting guide and the FAQ. E.g. the posting guide says Common posting mistakes: ... Finding a bug in an old version of R that has been fixed in the most recent version. This was a bug in 1.8.0, but the current version of R is 2.0.0 with 2.0.1 in beta test. We can't

[Rd] covariance bug (PR#7342)

2004-11-04 Thread christianlederer
Full_Name: Christian Lederer Version: 1.8.0 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (217.229.7.13) R-1.8.0 seems to calculate wrong covariances, when the argument of cov() is a matrix or a data frame. The following should produce a matrix of zeroes and NaNs: x <- matrix(c(NA ,NA ,0.9068995 ,NA ,-0.31

Re: [Rd] 2.0.1 buglets

2004-11-04 Thread Paul Gilbert
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Paul Gilbert wrote: With R-2.0.1 (patched) on Linux rhlinux 2.4.21-4.ELsmp when I configure get ... checking whether C runtime needs -D__NO_MATH_INLINES... no checking for xmkmf... /usr/bin/X11/xmkmf Usage: which [options] [--] programname [...] Opti

Re: problem with tcltk under Windows (was [Rd] RE: [R] one more Rcmdrproblem)

2004-11-04 Thread Kjetil Brinchmann Halvorsen
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: This is known and we believe already fixed, so please try a beta of 2.0.1, from http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/rpatched.html [BTW, the header is wrong, this is R-2.0.1 beta, not patch.] Or just don't use Ctrl-C That's not likely to succeed in classes .

Re: [Rd] 2.0.1 buglets

2004-11-04 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > but everything seems to configure and make ok. Should this message be > > > expect or is this a bug? > > > > It is unexpected. Is it new in 2.0.1 beta? You have told us your kernel, > > not your distro. This looks like a bug, but not in R. > >

Re: [Rd] 2.0.1 buglets

2004-11-04 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Paul Gilbert wrote: > > > With R-2.0.1 (patched) on Linux rhlinux 2.4.21-4.ELsmp > > > > when I configure get > > ... > > checking whether C runtime needs -D__NO_MATH_INLINES... no > > checking for xmkmf... /usr/bin/X11/xmkmf >

Re: [Rd] 2.0.1 buglets

2004-11-04 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Paul Gilbert wrote: > With R-2.0.1 (patched) on Linux rhlinux 2.4.21-4.ELsmp > > when I configure get > ... > checking whether C runtime needs -D__NO_MATH_INLINES... no > checking for xmkmf... /usr/bin/X11/xmkmf > Usage: which [options] [--] programname [...] > Options: --ver

RE: problem with tcltk under Windows (was [Rd] RE: [R] onemore Rcmdrproblem)

2004-11-04 Thread John Fox
Dear Thomas, Brian Ripley has already mentioned that Windows/tcltk problems have been fixed in R 2.0.1 beta. I'll provide some background. In addition to the control-key problems with R 2.0.0, I and my students have been experiencing a number of Windows instability problems running the Rcmdr this

[Rd] 2.0.1 buglets

2004-11-04 Thread Paul Gilbert
With R-2.0.1 (patched) on Linux rhlinux 2.4.21-4.ELsmp when I configure get ... checking whether C runtime needs -D__NO_MATH_INLINES... no checking for xmkmf... /usr/bin/X11/xmkmf Usage: which [options] [--] programname [...] Options: --version, -[vV] Print version and exit successfully. -

Re: [Rd] 2.0.1 countdown

2004-11-04 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: How does one easily find out if one's favorite bugs have been fixed? Does the CHANGES file list them all or is there a more authoritative source? A bug that was fixed because it was reported should be listed with its PR# in the NEWS file. If a change

[Rd] mime type for R scripts

2004-11-04 Thread Vaidotas Zemlys
Hi, I use Gnome on my computer and sometimes I use its default text editor gedit. It uses gtksourceview library for syntax highlighting. I decided that it would be nice if gedit supported R syntax. So I created apropriate .lang file: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157370 Gedit picks ap

Re: [Rd] 2.0.1 countdown

2004-11-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
Gabor Grothendieck wrote: Peter Dalgaard biostat.ku.dk> writes: : We plan to a patch release on Nov.15 to fix up various problems that : cropped up after the release of R 2.0.0. Daily beta snapshots will be : made available until the day of release. : : Please check if your favourite bugs have b

[Rd] Bug report (PR#7341)

2004-11-04 Thread dan
Full_Name: Dan B Version: na OS: na Submission from: (NULL) (80.6.127.185) I can't log into the bug tracker (I can't find where to register / login). In this way I can't add the following context diff (hopefully in the right order) for my changes to the matrix.Rd... Hmm... I guess this should

Re: [Rd] 2.0.1 countdown

2004-11-04 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
Peter Dalgaard biostat.ku.dk> writes: : We plan to a patch release on Nov.15 to fix up various problems that : cropped up after the release of R 2.0.0. Daily beta snapshots will be : made available until the day of release. : : Please check if your favourite bugs have been fixed (but notice tha

Re: problem with tcltk under Windows (was [Rd] RE: [R] one more Rcmdrproblem)

2004-11-04 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
This is known and we believe already fixed, so please try a beta of 2.0.1, from http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/rpatched.html [BTW, the header is wrong, this is R-2.0.1 beta, not patch.] Or just don't use Ctrl-C On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Thomas Ruf wrote: > Dear all, > I'd like to u

problem with tcltk under Windows (was [Rd] RE: [R] one more Rcmdrproblem)

2004-11-04 Thread Thomas Ruf
Dear all, I'd like to use Rcmdr for teaching purposes but still have problems trying to use it under Windows XP. Everything works fine up to several minutes but then Rcmdr and R completely crash the second I hit a button or key. This indeed looks like a problem with tcltk. It is not any particular

Re: [Rd] error in chron object library

2004-11-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess you get something negative,because the year you have coded is 2011 rather than 1911! yes, you are correct! I'm using a routine for file format transform output_file <- leSRHchron(input_file) So you know how to solve it now? If not, what is leSRHchron()??? Uwe Ligg

Re: [Rd] error in chron object library

2004-11-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I guess you get something negative,because the year you have coded is > > 2011 rather than 1911! yes, you are correct! I'm using a routine for file format transform > output_file <- leSRHchron(input_file) and other routine for save output_file, but, in the output_file, year is save in shor

Re: [Rd] error in chron object library

2004-11-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Times series of rain and discharge in hydrologic - stations has above 95 years of daily records. In the temporal series over "serie" dataframe, using chron's object: library(chron) # load chron library length(serie$data) [1] 27182 serie$data[len