Full_Name: Stephen Harker
Version: 2.0.1
OS: Linux ppc YDL 3.01
Submission from: (NULL) (130.194.13.106)
I have made R 2.0.1 using YellowDog Linux 3.0.1 (kernel 2.6.7) on a
powerpc machine. This is to replace R 1.9.1. It makes without an error.
However, when I do `make check' towards the end I
> >
> > I've tested values of cex. Anything above 2.1249 seems to
> segfault.
>
>
> The X11 device works pretty hard to find a font to use and if
> it really
> can't find anything it should throw an error, not segfault. Are you
> able to debug this and see where it is failing?
I haven'
Hi
Warnes, Gregory R wrote:
Ah, I'm using Exceed Hummingbird 7.1 as the X server
It does have fixed width fonts, and it is happy with variable width fonts up
to this extreme
A little more fiddling shows that this succeds with a linux based X11
server, and that even
plot(1,1)
par(fami
Ah, I'm using Exceed Hummingbird 7.1 as the X server
It does have fixed width fonts, and it is happy with variable width fonts up
to this extreme
A little more fiddling shows that this succeds with a linux based X11
server, and that even
plot(1,1)
par(family="mono",ce
What version of GCC?
We user GCC 3.4.0.
-G
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 4:30 PM
> To: Warnes, Gregory R
> Cc: Paul Murrell; Jain, Nitin; R-Devel; Frank E Harrell Jr
> Subject: RE: [Rd] RE: [R] SAS or R software
>
[Please update the subject line, folks!]
We need to know the device in use here ... and only a few support this
mechanism.
If it is X11(), I suspect the problem is in what fonts are available,
since cex=8 is pretty extreme. So most likely you need to contribute a
patch based on debugging on yo
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 16:31 -0500, Warnes, Gregory R wrote:
> What version of GCC?
>
> We user GCC 3.4.0.
>
> -G
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat 3.4.2-6.fc3)
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Marc
__
[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 16:13 -0500, Warnes, Gregory R wrote:
> Yes, par(family="mono") would work, except that I get R segfaults from this
> sequence:
>
> >
> > plot.new()
> > par(family="mono")
> > par(cex=8)
> > strheight("foo")
>
> Process R segmentation fault (core dumped) at Mon Dec 20 16:07
> Yes, par(family="mono") would work, except that I get R segfaults from this
> sequence:
> > plot.new()
> > par(family="mono")
> > par(cex=8)
> > strheight("foo")
> Process R segmentation fault (core dumped) at Mon Dec 20 16:07:56 2004
> on R 2.0.1 (2004-11-15), Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release
Yes, par(family="mono") would work, except that I get R segfaults from this
sequence:
>
> plot.new()
> par(family="mono")
> par(cex=8)
> strheight("foo")
Process R segmentation fault (core dumped) at Mon Dec 20 16:07:56 2004
on R 2.0.1 (2004-11-15), Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3
In m
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 08:40 +1300, Paul Murrell wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Warnes, Gregory R wrote:
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Frank E Harrell Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>This is neat Greg. Just installed the latest gregmisc. Do you
> >>automatically used fixed
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 20:36 +0100, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I was just curious if anyone from R Core might comment on the nature and
> > scope of the cooperation, as I could not find anything at the Gnumeric
> > web site on this.
> >
> > Does this su
Hi
Warnes, Gregory R wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Frank E Harrell Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
This is neat Greg. Just installed the latest gregmisc. Do you
automatically used fixed width fonts for this, for alignment
of columns?
Unfortunately, I haven't found any way to selec
Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was just curious if anyone from R Core might comment on the nature and
> scope of the cooperation, as I could not find anything at the Gnumeric
> web site on this.
>
> Does this suggest that perhaps code sharing and/or some level of
> validation is ta
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 12:31 -0500, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2004, at 10:20 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
> > I was just curious if anyone from R Core might comment on the
> nature
> > and
> > scope of the cooperation, as I could not find anything at the
> Gnumeric
> > web site on this.
>
>
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
According to the following Windows package building info:
http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/
fptex is easier to install with the R package building tools than
MikTex. I have been using MikTex but was thinking of switching
over to fptex to simplify my setup.
M
According to the following Windows package building info:
http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/
fptex is easier to install with the R package building tools than
MikTex. I have been using MikTex but was thinking of switching
over to fptex to simplify my setup.
My concern is that I ha
On Dec 20, 2004, at 10:20 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
I was just curious if anyone from R Core might comment on the nature
and
scope of the cooperation, as I could not find anything at the Gnumeric
web site on this.
I don't know about that, either, but as of R and Gnumeric i know that
Duncan was wor
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank E Harrell Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
> This is neat Greg. Just installed the latest gregmisc. Do you
> automatically used fixed width fonts for this, for alignment
> of columns?
Unfortunately, I haven't found any way to select fixed-width fon
Hi all,
A hopefully quick query. I was reading a posting over at
gnomedesktop.org on the latest release of Gnumeric 1.4:
http://gnomedesktop.org/node/2090
There is a mention there:
Improved accuracy:
While Gnumeric 1.2 was already the best available source for
accuracy in statis
Marcus, Gordon, and R developers,
Thanks to you both for kind and useful replies. Gordon you are correct,
I did post this question once before but, as I approach publication of a
rapid communication paper, wanted to make absolutely sure that I was
correct in assuming that the p values of p.adjust
You asked the same question on the Bioconductor mailing list back in August.
At that time, you
suggested yourself a solution for how the adjusted p-values should be
interpreted. I answered
your query and told you that your interpretation was correct. So I'm not sure
what more can be
said, exc
22 matches
Mail list logo
