... which is equivalent to this:
as.function(list(function(x){}))
which doesn't really make sense (and is the same as part #2 of bug 7495
reported earlier anyway).
Jeroen, notice that w_R.fc[2] is a list containing a function, and not
the function itself. Not sure what this construct is good for,
I'm probably not using the function right, but anyway, the program said:
"please bug.report."
> w_R.f1=function(PR,Pc) return (Pc*PR^3)
>
> w_R.f2=function(PR,Pc) return (Pc*PR)
>
> w_R.fc=c(w_R.f1,w_R.f2)
> w_R.fc[2]
[[1]]
function(PR,Pc) return (Pc*PR)
>
> RSD(type=3,
+ gparP=gpar(col="red"),
+
Guten Tag
Im Rahmen einer Studienarbeit an der Hochschule fuer Technik in Rapperswil
(HSR), zum Thema SPAM, haben wir
Ihre E-Mail Adresse auf einer CD-ROM gefunden welche bei EBay gehandelt wird
(Adresshandel).
Wir haben insbesondere alle E-Mail Adressen von Schweizer Unis und ETHs
herausgesuc
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> MM> I agree that I don't see a good reason to allow specifying 'n'
> MM> as argument unless e.g. for "bonferroni".
> MM> What do other think ?
>
> no reaction yet.
>
> I've thought a bit more in the mean time:
> Assume someone has 10
> "MM" == Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:02:39 +0100 writes:
> "GS" == Gordon Smyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:55:35 +1100 writes:
<..>
GS> 7. The 'n' argument is removed. Setting this argument
GS>
