Re: [Rd] Bug in Version 2010 (PR#7807)

2005-04-27 Thread ripley
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --27464147-697381171-1114669841=:21056 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Loo

Re: [Rd] Enhanced version of plot.lm()

2005-04-27 Thread John Maindonald
On 28 Apr 2005, at 1:30 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: "PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 27 Apr 2005 16:54:02 +0200 writes: PD> Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I'm about to commit the current proposal(s) to R-devel, **INCLUDING** changing the default from 'which = 1:4' t

Re: [Rd] Re: [Filtered!] Re: [R] postscript (eps) / latex / par(mfg=...) / problem!

2005-04-27 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:48 +0100, Dan Bolser wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Marc Schwartz wrote: > >So, unless I am missing something and without yet delving further into > >graphic device specific source code, I suspect that there is a problem > >when creating PS/EPS/PDF files in conjunction with

[Rd] Re: postscript (eps) / latex / par(mfg=...) / problem! (PR#7820)

2005-04-27 Thread MSchwartz
Just for the sake of linkage and further information, a related post to this bug is on r-devel at: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2005-April/033016.html Marc Schwartz __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listin

[Rd] Re: [Filtered!] Re: [R] postscript (eps) / latex / par(mfg=...) / problem!

2005-04-27 Thread Dan Bolser
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Marc Schwartz wrote: >Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed >Warning: (x.mfg.eps). >Warning: Please read the "FilterNotice.txt" attachment(s) for more information. > >[MOVED TO R-DEVEL] > >On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 18:05 +0100, Dan Bolser wrote: >> Should I

[Rd] RE: [R] Advice for calling a C function

2005-04-27 Thread Huntsinger, Reid
You have the dimensions switched, in double x [*MATDESC][*OBJ]; so when the dimensions aren't equal you do get odd things. You might be better off defining functions to index into mat with a pair of subscripts directly (.C() copies the argument anyway). Come to think of it, there might be macro

Re: (PR#7803) [Rd] print.data.frame(), wrong column names alignement,

2005-04-27 Thread ripley
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --27464147-733928972-1114633091=:27258 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE I'v

RE: [Rd] as.data.frame: Error in "names<-.default" (PR#7808)

2005-04-27 Thread ripley
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] >> f <- function(x) deparse(substitute(x)) >> f(FUN(x1[1:3,,], x2=c("a","b"), x3=c("a", "b"), x4=c("a", "b"))) > [1] "FUN(x1[1:3, , ], x2 = c(\"a\", \"b\"), x3 = c(\"a\", \"b\"), x4 = > c(\"a\", " > [2] "\"b\"))" > > > which is caused by depa

Re: [Rd] Enhanced version of plot.lm()

2005-04-27 Thread Martin Maechler
> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on 27 Apr 2005 16:54:02 +0200 writes: PD> Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm about to commit the current proposal(s) to R-devel, >> **INCLUDING** changing the default from >> 'which = 1:4' to 'which = c(1:3

Re: [Rd] Enhanced version of plot.lm()

2005-04-27 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm about to commit the current proposal(s) to R-devel, > **INCLUDING** changing the default from > 'which = 1:4' to 'which = c(1:3,5) > > and ellicit feedback starting from there. > > One thing I think I would like is to use color for t

SOLVED RE: [Rd] Problems compiling C code on windows

2005-04-27 Thread Victor Trevino
Thanks all replies, I followed your advice. From readme.package I installed Rtools and Mingw, set them in front of my path and now everything is running. Thanks very much! > -Original Message- > From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 April 2005 14:59 > To: Victor Trevino

Re: [Rd] Problems compiling C code on windows

2005-04-27 Thread Uwe Ligges
Victor Trevino wrote: Hi all, I can't get my C routines running on a windows box. I have no problems at all in Linux. On windows, I have installed cygwin and the compilation works well but once I execute "dyn.load(.)" it hangs whatever I use C/C++ interfaces. cygwin is not supported. Please

Re: [Rd] Enhanced version of plot.lm()

2005-04-27 Thread Martin Maechler
> "MM" == Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:13:38 +0200 writes: > "JMd" == John Maindonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:44:26 +1000 writes: JMd> The web page http://wwwmaths.anu.edu.au/~johnm/r/plot-lm/ JMd> now includes f

Re: [Rd] Problems compiling C code on windows

2005-04-27 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Victor Trevino wrote: I can't get my C routines running on a windows box. I have no problems at all in Linux. On windows, I have installed cygwin and the compilation works well but once I execute "dyn.load(.)" it hangs whatever I use C/C++ interfaces. Please try reading the R-a

[Rd] Problems compiling C code on windows

2005-04-27 Thread Victor Trevino
Hi all, I can't get my C routines running on a windows box. I have no problems at all in Linux. On windows, I have installed cygwin and the compilation works well but once I execute "dyn.load(.)" it hangs whatever I use C/C++ interfaces. In Linux it works wonderful but I need to get thi

[Rd] smooth.spline(): residuals(), fitted(),...

2005-04-27 Thread Martin Maechler
It has bothered me for quite some time that a smoothing spline fit doesn't allow access to residuals or fitted values in general, since after fit <- smooth.spline(x,y, *) the resulting fit$x is really equal to the unique (up to 1e-6 precision) sorted original x values and fit$yin (and $y) is acc

Re: [Rd] RE: [R] when can we expect Prof Tierney's compiled R?

2005-04-27 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Vadim Ogranovich wrote: Thank you for sharing the benchmark results. The improvement is very substantial, I am looking forward to the release of the byte compiler! The arithmetic shows that x[i]<- is still the bottleneck. I suspect that this is due to a very involved dispatchin