Re: [Rd] can't build packages anymore...

Jeff D. Hamann wrote: R developers, I've been happily building packages, under windows, for some time now and upgraded to R 2.1.0 and now when I attempt to build a package, I get the following errors... C:\conifers>rcmd build Rconifers * checking for file 'Rconifers/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * prepari

Re: [Rd] How to understand packages, namespaces, environments

Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Mon, 9 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Alexander Stoddard] Subject: Re: [Rd] How to understand packages, namespaces, environments Does saying the following load package 'foo' into its own environment ? > library(foo) [Duncan Murdoch] This loads some of the (name, obj

RE: [Rd] How to understand packages, namespaces, environments

On Mon, 9 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Alexander Stoddard] Subject: Re: [Rd] How to understand packages, namespaces, environments Does saying the following load package 'foo' into its own environment ? > library(foo) [Duncan Murdoch] This loads some of the (name, object) pairs from the packa

[Rd] can't build packages anymore...

R developers, I've been happily building packages, under windows, for some time now and upgraded to R 2.1.0 and now when I attempt to build a package, I get the following errors... C:\conifers>rcmd build Rconifers * checking for file 'Rconifers/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * preparing 'Rconifers': * chec

Re: [Rd] Light-weight data.frame class: was: how to add method to .Primitive function

Vadim, On May 8, 2005, at 2:09 PM, Vadim Ogranovich wrote: # the naive "[.lwdf" = function (x, i, j) lapply(x[j], function (col) col[i]) Umm... what about his: "[.lwdf" = function(x, i, j) { r<-lapply(lapply(j,function(a) x [[a]]),function(x) x[i]); names(r)<-names(x)[j]; r } The subsetting oper

RE: [Rd] How to understand packages, namespaces, environments

> On 5/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Alexander Stoddard] > > > Subject: Re: [Rd] How to understand packages, namespaces, > > > environments > > > > > > > > > > > Does saying the following load package 'foo' into its own > > > environment ? > > > > > library(foo) > > > >

Re: [Rd] How to understand packages, namespaces, environments

On 5/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Alexander Stoddard] > > Subject: Re: [Rd] How to understand packages, namespaces, environments > > > > > > > > Does saying the following load package 'foo' into its own > > environment ? > > > > library(foo) > > > [Duncan Murdoch] > > This

RE: [Rd] How to understand packages, namespaces, environments

[Alexander Stoddard] > Subject: Re: [Rd] How to understand packages, namespaces, environments > > > > > Does saying the following load package 'foo' into its own > environment ? > > > library(foo) > [Duncan Murdoch] > This loads some of the (name, object) pairs from the package into two > envi

[Rd] docu of isoreg

?isoreg has isoreg(x, y = NULL) Arguments: |x, y| in |isoreg|, coordinate vectors of the regression points. Alternatively a single “plotting” structure can be specified: see |xy.coords |. |...| potentially further arguments passed to methods. the ... dots seem superfluou

[Rd] Light-weight data.frame class: was: how to add method to .Primitive function

Hi, Encouraged by a tip from Simon Urbanek I tried to use the S3 machinery to write a faster version of the data.frame class. This quickly hits a snag: the "[.default"(x, i) for some reason cares about the dimensionality of x. In the end there is a full transcript of my R session. It includes the

Re: [Rd] Different package versions on CRAN?

Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Sun, 8 May 2005, Philippe Grosjean wrote: I am making changes to some of my packages that are exposed in CRAN. Some changes make them incompatible with previous R versions [and I use Depends: R (>= 2.1.0)]. I suspect that, as soon as I will upload this new version to

Re: [Rd] Different package versions on CRAN?

On Sun, 8 May 2005, Philippe Grosjean wrote: I am making changes to some of my packages that are exposed in CRAN. Some changes make them incompatible with previous R versions [and I use Depends: R (>= 2.1.0)]. I suspect that, as soon as I will upload this new version to CRAN, it will replace the

[Rd] Different package versions on CRAN?

Hello, I am making changes to some of my packages that are exposed in CRAN. Some changes make them incompatible with previous R versions [and I use Depends: R (>= 2.1.0)]. I suspect that, as soon as I will upload this new version to CRAN, it will replace the old one _everywhere_? However, the p