Re: [Rd] R Include File Guards

Paul Roebuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > R 2.1.0/src/include from 2005/04/18 download > > Naming inconsistent for guards as well but that's pedantic. > Simple convention: > file > #ifndef R_FOO_H > file > #ifndef R_EXT_BAR_H > > Missing guards: > > > > > > > > > > > Ill

Re: [Rd] SVN revision numbers

On Wed, 18 May 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2005, Cyrus Harmon wrote: Following up on my own post... touching non-tarball and then doing a make fixes the problem. I assume this is documented somewhere and I just missed it. The make process does touch non-tarball: you may need to

Re: [Rd] R Include File Guards

On Wed, 18 May 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Wed, 18 May 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote: > > > R 2.1.0/src/include from 2005/04/18 download > > > > Naming inconsistent for guards as well but that's pedantic. > > Simple convention: > > file > >#ifndef R_FOO_H > > file > >#ifndef R_EXT_B

Re: [Rd] R Include File Guards

On Wed, 18 May 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote: R 2.1.0/src/include from 2005/04/18 download Naming inconsistent for guards as well but that's pedantic. Simple convention: file #ifndef R_FOO_H file #ifndef R_EXT_BAR_H Missing guards: Illegal Guards (leading underscore): What is `illeg

Re: [Rd] SVN revision numbers

On Wed, 18 May 2005, Cyrus Harmon wrote: Following up on my own post... touching non-tarball and then doing a make fixes the problem. I assume this is documented somewhere and I just missed it. The make process does touch non-tarball: you may need to start from a clean build. (BTW, that's not n

[Rd] R Include File Guards

R 2.1.0/src/include from 2005/04/18 download Naming inconsistent for guards as well but that's pedantic. Simple convention: file #ifndef R_FOO_H file #ifndef R_EXT_BAR_H Missing guards: Illegal Guards (leading underscore): -

Re: [Rd] SVN revision numbers

Following up on my own post... touching non-tarball and then doing a make fixes the problem. I assume this is documented somewhere and I just missed it. Cyrus On May 18, 2005, at 1:36 PM, Cyrus Harmon wrote: I'm seeing an error about not being able to find SVN-REVISION in the R (top src dir)

Re: [Rd] SVN revision numbers

I'm seeing an error about not being able to find SVN-REVISION in the R (top src dir) when I try to build from current SVN sources. Is this a file that is supposed to be generated that I'm not generating for some reason, or is this supposed to be in the SVN repository? My apologies if I'm cat

[Rd] SVN revision numbers

You will start to see SVN revision numbers appearing in the the R-devel version of R, for example R : Copyright 2005, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.2.0 Under development (unstable) (2005-05-18 r34401) ISBN 3-900051-07-0 This has been done to enable us to track more

[Rd] Re: [R] Fortran 95 in R ?

First you need a functional F95 compiler. I believe `g95' is obselete, replaced by gfortran. For how to use that, please do read the R-admin manual in R 2.1.0 -- it can be done if you use a bug-fixed version of gfortran (post gcc-4.0.0) or a workaround. Reliable F95 compilers such as those o