On 5 June 2005 at 12:48, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel has done a lot of work integrating the CRAN and other
| R package collections with the Debian GNU/Linux package management
| system. This rather neatly solves the non-CRAN dependency problems, at
| least for Debian.
Thanks
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>I think that some time ago there was a discussion of having a downloadable
>file that oould be used to help.search through so that a relatively small
>download and no package installation would allow a comprehensive
>offline help.search of all CRAN packages. An online
On 6/5/05, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> > Of course, with disk sizes as they are now, it's not unreasonable to
> > install all of the contributed CRAN packages on a PC. Then
> > help.search() *will* do searches through them all.
>
> Some of
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> Of course, with disk sizes as they are now, it's not unreasonable to
> install all of the contributed CRAN packages on a PC. Then
> help.search() *will* do searches through them all.
Some of them are very specialized, and some of them have non-CRAN
dependencies. I've do
On 5 June 2005 at 17:31, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > Jim raises good points, as do the replies. On the topic of '500+ and
| > growing', let me add my pet peeve: It is mighty impossible to know /what/
| > changed /when/ in CRANland.
| >
| > Being De
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jim raises good points, as do the replies. On the topic of '500+ and
> growing', let me add my pet peeve: It is mighty impossible to know /what/
> changed /when/ in CRANland.
>
> Being Debian maintainer for a fair number of packages, I owe users of
Jim raises good points, as do the replies. On the topic of '500+ and
growing', let me add my pet peeve: It is mighty impossible to know /what/
changed /when/ in CRANland.
Being Debian maintainer for a fair number of packages, I owe users of those
packages timely updates. But the best I can do is
Hi. I think this discussion is more relevant to R-devel, so that's
where I've sent my reply.
Jim Lemon wrote:
Hello again,
First, thanks for the help that got the latest plotrix package finished.
I had been planning to write something about packages since Scott
Waichler offered the gantt.ch
On 04-Jun-05 Martin Maechler wrote:
>> "UweL" == Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> on Sat, 04 Jun 2005 11:43:34 +0200 writes:
>
> UweL> (Ted Harding) wrote:
> >> On 03-Jun-05 Ted Harding wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> I have a suggestion (maybe it should also go to R-devel).
>
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, James Bullard wrote:
Hi all, this should be a relatively straightforward question. I am
constructing an R list in C which will contain both Integers and Strings (by
string I mean in C I have const char* whose values I want passed through to
R) The Integers are easy. I do so
10 matches
Mail list logo
