[Rd] bug in methods' 'initialize' (or the functions called in turn) ?

2004-11-16 Thread Laurent Gautier
Hi, I experience a very strange behaviour when trying to instanciate a S4 class. A call like 'r <- new("MyClass", foo="bar")' returns apparently cleanly, but in fact a subsequent use of 'r' results in a 'r does not exist error message'. After a bit of hunting with 'debug', it seems that the bug

[Rd] configure, config.site and TCLTK_CPPFLAGS

2003-10-27 Thread Laurent Gautier
Hi, I am trying to configure R-1.8.0-patched (fresh rsync) for machines with the tcltk files in unorthodox locations. I specified a TCLTK_CPPFLAGS='/usr/freeware/include/' in the file config.site but it seems that a '# no special path needed' is added when running configure, causing trouble (See t

Re: [Rd] help.search in trouble with R-patched ?

2003-10-15 Thread Laurent Gautier
14, 2003, at 23:02, Laurent Gautier wrote: > > >>help.search("prompt", agrep=F) > === > Jan de Leeuw; Professor and Chair, UCLA Department of Statistics; > Editor: Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Journal of Statistical > Software > US mail: 8130 Math Sc

[Rd] help.search in trouble with R-patched ?

2003-10-14 Thread Laurent Gautier
...unless its me missing something... > help.search("prompt", agrep=F) Error: couldn't find function ".class1" > traceback() 12: initialize(value, ...) 11: initialize(value, ...) 10: new("ObjectsWithPackage", value, package = pkg) 9: metaNameUndo(unique(these), prefix = "M", searchForm = searchFo

[Rd] function 'density' in r-devel

2003-09-18 Thread Laurent Gautier
Hi, Just to report. I yesterday's r-devel I get: > d <- density(rnorm(100)) Error in var(x, na.rm = na.rm) : 3 arguments passed to "cov" which requires 4. Regards, L. __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/

[Rd] 'methods' and environments.

2003-06-02 Thread Laurent Gautier
Hi, I have quite some trouble with the package methods. "Environments" in R are a convenient way to emulate pointers (and avoid copies of large objects, or of large collections of objects). So far, so good, but the package methods is becoming more (and more) problematic to work with. Up to version

[Rd] R CMD check (again)

2003-03-11 Thread Laurent Gautier
in Taipei, Taiwan ---------- Laurent Gautier CBS, Building 208, DTU PhD. StudentDK-2800 Lyngby,Denmark tel: +45 45 25 24 89http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/laurent __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/

[Rd] problem with R-devel and R CMD check ?

2003-03-10 Thread Laurent Gautier
Hi, R CMD check is causing some "make sure it passes check, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@%% !! - I *did* check it passes check #$%#$!5 !!!" disagrement... I currently have two versions of the same package... one goes through the check, the other does not. bin/R CMD check ~/these/R/affy --library=${HOME}/my