On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:53:55AM -0700, Thomas Lumley wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Chris Jackson wrote:
>
> > Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why do you need to edit PATH? I never have the rw10xx/bin directory
> > > in my Desktop PATH. I do set the PATH in a terminal window
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Chris Jackson wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do you need to edit PATH? I never have the rw10xx/bin directory
> > in my Desktop PATH. I do set the PATH in a terminal window when
> > working with R, but I do that via the shell startup options (.t
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do you need to edit PATH? I never have the rw10xx/bin directory
> in my Desktop PATH. I do set the PATH in a terminal window when
> working with R, but I do that via the shell startup options (.tcshrc
> in my case).
Emacs needs to know the locat
Why do you need to edit PATH? I never have the rw10xx/bin directory in my
Desktop PATH. I do set the PATH in a terminal window when working with R,
but I do that via the shell startup options (.tcshrc in my case).
It is I believe possible to get the installer to do this, but it may well
not b
I have just diligently upgraded my R installation for Windows XP Pro to
1.8.0. As an ESS user and R package builder, part of this upgrade process
for me always involves editing the PATH environment variable by hand to
update the location of the R bin directory.
Would it be possible or desirable f
