What do you think is the correct answer and on what authority?
(These are explicitly sequential aka Type 1 anova tables.)
That the SSqs depend on the order of fitting is a feature of an unbalanced
design. I believe that R is correct and your understanding is not.
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROT
It is not a bug. It is supposed to be that way. It is even a FAQ.
-thomas
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Tanya Logvinenko
> Version: 1.7.0
> OS: Windows 2000
> Submission from: (NULL) (132.183.156.125)
>
>
> For unbalanced design, I ran into problem with ANOVA
Full_Name: Tanya Logvinenko
Version: 1.7.0
OS: Windows 2000
Submission from: (NULL) (132.183.156.125)
For unbalanced design, I ran into problem with ANOVA (aov function). The sum of
squares for only for the second factor and total are computed correctly, but sum
of squares for the first factor is
