[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> R version: 1.7.1
> OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2
>
> Hi all,
>
> The formula object in model.frame() is not retrieved properly when
> model.frame() is called from within a function and the "subset" argument
> is supplied.
>
> foo <- function(formula,data,subset=NULL)
> {
>
That attachment disappeared from the previous mail. Here is the patch I
mentioned.
diff -Naur src/library/nls/R/nls.R /tmp/R/nls.R
--- src/library/nls/R/nls.R Mon Jul 28 11:11:06 2003
+++ /tmp/R/nls.RThu Aug 7 10:04:49 2003
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
nlsModel.plinear <- function( form, data,
R version: 1.7.1
OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2
Hi all,
The formula object in model.frame() is not retrieved properly when
model.frame() is called from within a function and the "subset" argument
is supplied.
foo <- function(formula,data,subset=NULL)
{
cat("\n*Does formula[-3] == ~y ? TRUE **
On Thursday, Aug 7, 2003, at 04:13 US/Eastern, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
[[ I did discover yesterday (or maybe I was just reminded...) that we
even have nonstandard nonstandard evaluation rules in some places
(nls() seems to evaluate its model formula in the global environment
even if it is given
Thanks for your reply and discussion on the issue. See below for another
suggestion of a fix.
I have spent some time trying to find a fix which would still work as
documented:
> Variables in the formula, `subset' and in `...' are looked for
> first in `data' and then in the environmen
On 7 Aug 2003, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
> [[ I did discover yesterday (or maybe I was just reminded...) that we
> even have nonstandard nonstandard evaluation rules in some places
> (nls() seems to evaluate its model formula in the global environment
> even if it is given explicitly within a funct
On Thursday, Aug 7, 2003, at 10:14 US/Eastern, Thomas Lumley wrote:
On 7 Aug 2003, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
[[ I did discover yesterday (or maybe I was just reminded...) that we
even have nonstandard nonstandard evaluation rules in some places
(nls() seems to evaluate its model formula in the glo
