Re: [Rd] pnorm problem (PR#7302)

2004-10-21 Thread Morten Welinder
Mea culpa. Chalk this up to incorrect mucking with the trunc function on my side, a very old bug here. Apologies. Morten __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] pnorm problem (PR#7302)

2004-10-21 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Uwe Ligges wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Full_Name: Morten Welinder > > Version: 2 > > OS: Solaris(sparc) > > Submission from: (NULL) (65.213.85.208) > > > > Works for me with R-2.0.0, Solaris 5.7 (UltraSparc), gcc-3.2.3, 32-bit. > So you have to specify compiler ver

Re: [Rd] pnorm problem (PR#7302)

2004-10-21 Thread Uwe Ligges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Morten Welinder Version: 2 OS: Solaris(sparc) Submission from: (NULL) (65.213.85.208) Works for me with R-2.0.0, Solaris 5.7 (UltraSparc), gcc-3.2.3, 32-bit. So you have to specify compiler version, OS version, R version etc. much more precisely. Uwe Ligges (g

[Rd] pnorm problem (PR#7302)

2004-10-21 Thread terra
Full_Name: Morten Welinder Version: 2 OS: Solaris(sparc) Submission from: (NULL) (65.213.85.208) (gdb) p pnorm(-10.1, 0.0, 1.0, 0, 1) $42 = NaN(0xf) Expected: -0 (gdb) p pnorm(-10.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0, 1) $43 = -0 Good. (I know this is not a typical usage.)