Re: [Rd] promptClass("numeric")

2004-08-16 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Monday 16 August 2004 09:43, Wolski wrote: > Hi! > > As I said its not really a Problem. Its just an inconsistency which > need is not apparent to me. > > You can alternatively use promptClass or promptMethods to document > methods. > > promptClass always generates a section: > \section{Meth

Re: [Rd] promptClass("numeric")

2004-08-16 Thread Wolski
Hi! As I said its not really a Problem. Its just an inconsistency which need is not apparent to me. You can alternatively use promptClass or promptMethods to document methods. promptClass always generates a section: \section{Methods}{ \describe{ \item{coerce}{\code{signature

Re: [Rd] promptClass("numeric")

2004-08-16 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Monday 16 August 2004 08:54, Wolski wrote: > Hi! > > Have written some functions with signature "numeric". > > eg. > setGeneric("foo", > function(object,...) >standardGeneric("foo")) > setMethod("foo",signature(object="numeric"),def = > > To generate the Rd file sceleton i

[Rd] promptClass("numeric")

2004-08-16 Thread Wolski
Hi! Have written some functions with signature "numeric". eg. setGeneric("foo", function(object,...) standardGeneric("foo")) setMethod("foo",signature(object="numeric"),def = To generate the Rd file sceleton i use > promtClass("numeric") A shell of class documentation has