Deepayan Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 19 July 2004 14:03, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> Note one difference subversion <-> CVS :
>>
>> subversion being a 21th century child it rather
>> optimizes bandwidth over the expense of disk space:
>>
>> It keeps files 'pristine' and your mod
On Monday 19 July 2004 14:03, Martin Maechler wrote:
> Note one difference subversion <-> CVS :
>
> subversion being a 21th century child it rather
> optimizes bandwidth over the expense of disk space:
>
> It keeps files 'pristine' and your modification.
> I.e. you need more than double the disks
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:15:37 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (A.J.
Rossini) wrote :
>
>Looks like it's down again? (this, after it almost worked a while
>back).
Yes, I'm now getting errors when I try an update:
>$ svn update
>svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/R/trunk'
>svn:
>Could not open the request
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 14:57, Martin Maechler wrote:
> > "Marc" == Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > on Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:22:43 -0500 writes:
>
> Marc> Uwe,
> Marc> That did it. Using https: I am now able to do a checkout.
>
> Marc> It seems to be slow at the moment,
Looks like it's down again? (this, after it almost worked a while
back).
I'm glad I'm GNU arch'ing it...
best,
-tony
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Marc" == Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> on Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:22:43 -0500 writes:
>
> Marc> Uwe,
>
> "Marc" == Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:22:43 -0500 writes:
Marc> Uwe,
Marc> That did it. Using https: I am now able to do a checkout.
Marc> It seems to be slow at the moment, but the files are coming through.
-
> "tony" == A J Rossini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:29:28 -0700 writes:
tony> Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Uwe,
>>
>> That did it. Using https: I am now able to do a checkout.
>>
>> It seems to be slow at the moment, but the f
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 13:29, Martin Maechler wrote:
> > "Marc" == Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > on Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:57:12 -0500 writes:
>
> Marc> On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 12:38, Douglas Bates wrote:
> >> Marc Schwartz wrote:
> >>
> >> > I am not able to access
Douglas Bates wrote:
Marc Schwartz wrote:
I am not able to access cvs via rsync today. Is the service down?
Yes. We should have sent email about it to r-devel but it has been a
hectic several days.
The bad news is that the newly installed cvs.r-project.org machine,
which is also rsync.r-projec
> "Marc" == Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:57:12 -0500 writes:
Marc> On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 12:38, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> Marc Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> > I am not able to access cvs via rsync today. Is the service down?
>>
>> Yes. We
Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uwe,
>
> That did it. Using https: I am now able to do a checkout.
>
> It seems to be slow at the moment, but the files are coming through.
Seems to run comparable to anoncvs. Also seems to hiccup and barf,
like anoncvs (infamouse server stalls).
T
> "UweL" == Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:01:07 +0200 writes:
UweL> A.J. Rossini wrote:
>> The svn server appears to be down.
UweL> Actually, I'm just checking out a developer release from
UweL> https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/
UweL> N
Uwe,
That did it. Using https: I am now able to do a checkout.
It seems to be slow at the moment, but the files are coming through.
Thanks,
Marc
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 13:01, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> A.J. Rossini wrote:
>
> > The svn server appears to be down.
>
> Actually, I'm just checking out
I stand corrected. One of the servers IS down, and the other one is
running.
best,
-tony
Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A.J. Rossini wrote:
>
>> The svn server appears to be down.
>
> Actually, I'm just checking out a developer release from
>
> https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/
>
A.J. Rossini wrote:
The svn server appears to be down.
Actually, I'm just checking out a developer release from
https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/
Note that https is required,
^
the unsecured http protocol seems not to be working...
Uwe
best,
-tony
Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 12:38, Douglas Bates wrote:
> Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
> > I am not able to access cvs via rsync today. Is the service down?
>
> Yes. We should have sent email about it to r-devel but it has been a
> hectic several days.
>
> The bad news is that the newly installed cvs.r-pr
The svn server appears to be down.
best,
-tony
Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
>> I am not able to access cvs via rsync today. Is the service down?
>
> Yes. We should have sent email about it to r-devel but it has been a
> hectic several days.
>
> The bad ne
Marc Schwartz wrote:
I am not able to access cvs via rsync today. Is the service down?
Yes. We should have sent email about it to r-devel but it has been a
hectic several days.
The bad news is that the newly installed cvs.r-project.org machine,
which is also rsync.r-project.org, was compromised
Hi all,
I am not able to access cvs via rsync today. Is the service down?
Thanks,
Marc Schwartz
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
19 matches
Mail list logo