> Roger Koenker wrote:
> > My understanding is that if I now try to construct a matrix.diag.csr
> > object checking of it should be like the checking for a matrix.csr object
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, John Chambers wrote:
> Well, hopefully. But there seems a slight problem in the validity
> method.
>
Roger Koenker wrote:
>
> I would like to add a class to the SparseM package. I have a class "matrix.csr"
> that describes a matrix in compressed sparse row format, now I would like a class
> matrix.diag.csr that describes such objects when they happen to be diagonal.
> The idea is that matrix.dia
I would like to add a class to the SparseM package. I have a class "matrix.csr"
that describes a matrix in compressed sparse row format, now I would like a class
matrix.diag.csr that describes such objects when they happen to be diagonal.
The idea is that matrix.diag.csr objects should behave (lat
