On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So my guess on scalable fonts was right.
I suspect this is a problem in how the X server is using Type1 fonts,
specifically in how it thinks they are encoded. This is why I asked
about the locale: \summation i
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So my guess on scalable fonts was right.
>
> I suspect this is a problem in how the X server is using Type1 fonts,
> specifically in how it thinks they are encoded. This is why I asked
> about the locale: \summation is \345 in the Adobe symbol char
So my guess on scalable fonts was right.
I suspect this is a problem in how the X server is using Type1 fonts,
specifically in how it thinks they are encoded. This is why I asked about
the locale: \summation is \345 in the Adobe symbol character set and
\circleplus is \305 which is a u/case to
On Friday 11 March 2005 13:13, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:17 +, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> > I see you have both a scalable font (the first) and size-specfic
> > fonts. My guess is that the scalable font is not encoded in the
> > same way as the others: can you track down w
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:17 +, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> I see you have both a scalable font (the first) and size-specfic fonts.
> My guess is that the scalable font is not encoded in the same way as the
> others: can you track down where it is coming from?
>
> Otherwise my list on FC3 is t
I see you have both a scalable font (the first) and size-specfic fonts.
My guess is that the scalable font is not encoded in the same way as the
others: can you track down where it is coming from?
Otherwise my list on FC3 is the same as yours (minus the duplicates, which
are also puzzling). I
On Friday 11 March 2005 01:19, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 19:57 -0600, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
> >> I'm seeing inconsistent symbols from the same expression with the
> >> following code:
> >>
> >>
> >> expr = expression(sum(x, 1, n)
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 19:57 -0600, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
I'm seeing inconsistent symbols from the same expression with the
following code:
expr = expression(sum(x, 1, n))
plot(1, main = expr, type = "n")
text(1, 1, expr)
Moreover, the inconsistency is reve
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 19:57 -0600, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
> I'm seeing inconsistent symbols from the same expression with the
> following code:
>
>
> expr = expression(sum(x, 1, n))
> plot(1, main = expr, type = "n")
> text(1, 1, expr)
>
>
> Moreover, the inconsistency is reversed in r-devel c
I'm seeing inconsistent symbols from the same expression with the
following code:
expr = expression(sum(x, 1, n))
plot(1, main = expr, type = "n")
text(1, 1, expr)
Moreover, the inconsistency is reversed in r-devel compared to R 2.0.1.
In particular, the main label shows a \bigoplus instead
10 matches
Mail list logo