Re: [Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

2005-03-13 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote: Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: So my guess on scalable fonts was right. I suspect this is a problem in how the X server is using Type1 fonts, specifically in how it thinks they are encoded. This is why I asked about the locale: \summation i

Re: [Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

2005-03-13 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So my guess on scalable fonts was right. > > I suspect this is a problem in how the X server is using Type1 fonts, > specifically in how it thinks they are encoded. This is why I asked > about the locale: \summation is \345 in the Adobe symbol char

Re: [Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

2005-03-12 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
So my guess on scalable fonts was right. I suspect this is a problem in how the X server is using Type1 fonts, specifically in how it thinks they are encoded. This is why I asked about the locale: \summation is \345 in the Adobe symbol character set and \circleplus is \305 which is a u/case to

Re: [Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

2005-03-12 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Friday 11 March 2005 13:13, Marc Schwartz wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:17 +, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > > I see you have both a scalable font (the first) and size-specfic > > fonts. My guess is that the scalable font is not encoded in the > > same way as the others: can you track down w

Re: [Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

2005-03-11 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:17 +, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > I see you have both a scalable font (the first) and size-specfic fonts. > My guess is that the scalable font is not encoded in the same way as the > others: can you track down where it is coming from? > > Otherwise my list on FC3 is t

Re: [Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

2005-03-11 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
I see you have both a scalable font (the first) and size-specfic fonts. My guess is that the scalable font is not encoded in the same way as the others: can you track down where it is coming from? Otherwise my list on FC3 is the same as yours (minus the duplicates, which are also puzzling). I

Re: [Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

2005-03-11 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Friday 11 March 2005 01:19, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Marc Schwartz wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 19:57 -0600, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: > >> I'm seeing inconsistent symbols from the same expression with the > >> following code: > >> > >> > >> expr = expression(sum(x, 1, n)

Re: [Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

2005-03-10 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Marc Schwartz wrote: On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 19:57 -0600, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: I'm seeing inconsistent symbols from the same expression with the following code: expr = expression(sum(x, 1, n)) plot(1, main = expr, type = "n") text(1, 1, expr) Moreover, the inconsistency is reve

Re: [Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

2005-03-10 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 19:57 -0600, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: > I'm seeing inconsistent symbols from the same expression with the > following code: > > > expr = expression(sum(x, 1, n)) > plot(1, main = expr, type = "n") > text(1, 1, expr) > > > Moreover, the inconsistency is reversed in r-devel c

[Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

2005-03-10 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
I'm seeing inconsistent symbols from the same expression with the following code: expr = expression(sum(x, 1, n)) plot(1, main = expr, type = "n") text(1, 1, expr) Moreover, the inconsistency is reversed in r-devel compared to R 2.0.1. In particular, the main label shows a \bigoplus instead