Hello,
I have a slight performance issue that I'd like to solve by rewriting a
short bit of code that uses for loops so that it would use apply in order
to get some performance gains. My problem is that I can't modify the
variables that are passed to apply function during apply functions
You are entitled to your opinion, but apparently you have not read the Posting
Guide either.
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On July 22, 2016 6:00:19 PM PDT, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>Jeff Newmiller dcn.davis.ca.us> writes:
>> 2) Interfacing R with other
Jeff Newmiller dcn.davis.ca.us> writes:
> 2) Interfacing R with other languages is off-topic on this list. There are
other lists where such issues are
> on-topic. Your post is a bit like walking into a bowling alley and asking if
anyone there can solve your
> chess problem... someone might be
Read the Posting Guide. This will tell you at least two important things:
1) Post using plain text. HTML mangles code.
2) Interfacing R with other languages is off-topic on this list. There are
other lists where such issues are on-topic. Your post is a bit like walking
into a bowling alley and
It really might help to have a minimum working example
Have a look at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example
and/or
http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Reproducibility.html
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada
> -Original Message-
> From:
Dear Jean,
Thank you so much for your reply and the solution, This does work. I was
wondering is this similar to 'rasterFromXYZ'? Thanks again!
Sincerely,
Milu
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Adams, Jean wrote:
> Milu,
>
> Perhaps an approach like this would work. In the
Hello everyone,
I am attempting to link to a C library named libxlsxwriter
(http://libxlsxwriter.github.io/) that creates and styles XLSX files, but after
several days of repeatedly reading "Writing R Extensions", and I am stuck and
hoping someone can help me.
The C library is easy to use and
> On Jul 21, 2016, at 3:04 PM, Qinghua He via R-help
> wrote:
>
> Using the same data, if I ran
> fit2
> <-glm(formula=AR~Age+LumA+LumB+HER2+Basal+Normal,family=binomial,data=RacComp1)summary(fit2)exp(coef(fit2))
> I obtained:
exp(coef(fit2))(Intercept) Age
Dear Peter
Have you tried removing the intercept? Just put -1 at the end of your
formula.
On 21/07/2016 23:04, Qinghua He via R-help wrote:
Using the same data, if I ran
fit2
<-glm(formula=AR~Age+LumA+LumB+HER2+Basal+Normal,family=binomial,data=RacComp1)summary(fit2)exp(coef(fit2))
I
approx() has a 'rule' argument that controls how it deals with
extrapolation. Run help(approx) and read about the details.
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 8:29 AM, lily li wrote:
> Thanks, Ismail.
> For the gaps before 2009-01-05 and
Thanks, Ismail.
For the gaps before 2009-01-05 and after 2009-11-20, I use the year 2010 to
fill in the missing values for column C. There is no relationship between
column A, B, and C.
For the missing values between 2009-01-05 and 2009-11-20, if there are any,
I found this approach is very
This is neither the Xpdf support forum nor the Windows Setup Program
Reinvention support group... and you really need to read and follow the Posting
Guide for the R mailing lists.
FWIW I would guess that you need to learn about environment variables and in
particular about the PATH variable.
Please post in plain text, the message is very hard to read with the
reformatting that was done.
Did you receive any warnings when you fit your models?
The fact that the last coefficient is NA in both outputs suggests that
there was some co-linearity in your predictor variables and R chose to
Milu,
Perhaps an approach like this would work. In the example below, I
calculate the mean GDP for each 1 degree by 1 degree.
temp$long1 <- floor(temp$longitude)
temp$lat1 <- floor(temp$latitude)
temp1 <- aggregate(GDP ~ long1 + lat1, temp, mean)
long1 lat1GDP
1 -69 -55 0.90268640
Hi lili,
The problem may lie in the fact that I think you are using
"interpolate" when you mean "extrapolate". In that case, the best you
can do is spread values beyond the points that you have. Find the
slope of the line, put a point at each end of your time data
(2009-01-01 and 2009-12-31) and
also it's lubridate, not lubricate :-/
On 07/21/2016 05:44 PM, Ismail SEZEN wrote:
You don't have to download and install from github. You can install
lubridate package easly from cran repository. If you really intend to
install from github, i advise you install devtools package first and use
Hi Nick,
If I understand you correctly, that should do it:
plot(x=seq_along(data)+2, y=data)
HTH,
Ivan
--
Ivan Calandra, PhD
Scientific Mediator
University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne
GEGENAA - EA 3795
CREA - 2 esplanade Roland Garros
51100 Reims, France
+33(0)3 26 77 36 89
Hi I have a vector of data (for example c(2,3,4,5,4,3,2)
data<-c(2,3,4,5,4,3,2)
plot(data)
I simply want to up the index values along the x axis by 2, so that instead of
1, I have 3, instead of 2 I have 4 etc etc. Despite ages playing around with
the axis function I can't get it to work, and
> On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:44 PM, Faradj Koliev wrote:
>
> Dear David Winsemius,
>
> Thank you!
>
> The sample make no sense, I know. The real data is too big. So, I only want
> to understand how to plot marginal effects, to visualize them in a proper
> way.
>
Before
Am Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:07:43 +0200
schrieb Martin Maechler :
> Ralf Goertz on Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:37:53 +0200
> writes:
>> I installed readline version 6.3 and the issue is gone. So probably
>> some of the recent changes in R's readline code are
> jeremiah rounds
> on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:56:17 -0700 writes:
> I appreciate the timing, so much so I changed the code to show the issue.
> It is a problem of scale.
> roll_lm probably has a heavy start-up cost but otherwise completely
>
Dear David Winsemius,
Thank you!
The sample make no sense, I know. The real data is too big. So, I only want to
understand how to plot marginal effects, to visualize them in a proper way.
Best,
> 22 juli 2016 kl. 08:35 skrev David Winsemius :
>
>>
>> On Jul 21,
> On Jul 21, 2016, at 2:22 PM, Faradj Koliev wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have two logistic regression models:
>
>
> • model <- glm(Y ~ X1+X2+X3+X4, data = data, family = "binomial")
>
>
>
> • modelInteraction <- glm(Y ~ X1+X2+X3+X4+X1*X4, data = data, family =
>
23 matches
Mail list logo