Maybe you will find that coord_cartesian( ylim=c(-30,30) ) works better since
it doesn't filter out data before rendering.
On August 28, 2021 6:45:11 PM PDT, p...@philipsmith.ca wrote:
>I am preparing a time series plot using the ggplot function. It includes
>an area plot outlined at its edges
I am preparing a time series plot using the ggplot function. It includes
an area plot outlined at its edges with a line plot. For some reason the
line plot, drawn with geom_line(), has some broken portions where the
line does not appear, although the filled geom_area() part of the plot
is
You messed up the dput somehow... but I think this works:
m <- t(structure(c(1, 57, 59, 271, 279, 59, 179, 279, 278, 359, 52,
118, 178, 239, 334), .Dim = c(5L, 3L)))
brk <- c( 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 )
mc <- matrix( findInterval( m, brk ), ncol = ncol(m) )
m
mc
DBI <- apply( mc, 1,
Hello,
I think I've found a solution, but it's not producing the same answer as
what you're expecting. I think you might've mixed up row and column a few
times, but you should be able to alter the following to your needs. Also,
see ?.bincode:
EB <- matrix(data = c(
1, 271, 179, 359, 178,
Dear all,
This short email to inform you that a new version of *superb* (SUmmary Plots
with adjusted ERror Bars) is now available on CRAN (version 0.9.7.5; codename
"two-tail 95% confident").
This package lets you generate plots with correct error bars without heavy
programming. I know
Dear R users,
I am happy to announce that my new package monobinShiny is now available on
CRAN.
This is an add-on package to the 'monobin' package that simplifies its use.
As reminder, the goal of 'monobin' is to perform monotonic binning of
numeric risk factor in credit rating models (PD, LGD,
Dear useRs,
Is there a way in R to see if the numbers in a matrix-row fall within the given
range or not? For example, I have the following data;
> dput(EB)
structure(c(1, 57, 59, 271, 279, 59, 179, 279, 278, 359, 52,
118, 178, 239, 334), .Dim = c(3L, 5L))
The ranges for which these numbers
I can understand Rolf's concern. Make is a tool that is very helpful,
but also not trivial to learn how to make work. If a good Makefile
has been set up, then things are easy, but I've generally found my
skills limited to fairly simple Makefiles.
I would suggest that what is needed is a bit of
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 12:49:04 +0300
Eric Berger wrote:
> As Achim wrote in point (2), Makefile is your friend.
Well, all I can say is that Makefile is *not* my friend; I have never
made its acquaintance and wouldn't know where to begin looking.
Would it be possible for you to provide a
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Rolf Turner wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:47:03 +0200
Achim Zeileis wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Rolf Turner wrote:
I have found that tools::texi2pf() ignores changes to the *.bib file
unless the *.bbl file is removed prior to re-running
tools::texi2pdf().
This is
I'm getting results from a package which differ from results that I got
a few weeks ago, and the only thing that I can think of that's changed
is the version of R (from 4.1.0 to 4.4.1).
So I wanted to install 4.1.0 and play around with that, to see if that
is indeed the explanation. (If that
As Achim wrote in point (2), Makefile is your friend.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 12:39 PM Rolf Turner
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:47:03 +0200
> Achim Zeileis wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Rolf Turner wrote:
> >
> > > I have found that tools::texi2pf() ignores changes to the *.bib file
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:47:03 +0200
Achim Zeileis wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> > I have found that tools::texi2pf() ignores changes to the *.bib file
> > unless the *.bbl file is removed prior to re-running
> > tools::texi2pdf().
>
> This is how texi2pdf (or actually
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Rolf Turner wrote:
I have found that tools::texi2pf() ignores changes to the *.bib file
unless the *.bbl file is removed prior to re-running tools::texi2pdf().
This is how texi2pdf (or actually texi2dvi) from texinfo behaves. This is
likely what tools::texi2pdf calles in
14 matches
Mail list logo
