Re: [R] Error generated by nlme::gnls

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 16:03:24 +1200 Rolf Turner wrote: > My impression is that if the right hand side of a formula gets "too > long", then it gets split into parts --- which messes everything up. For new enough R (≥ 4.0), it's possible to use deparse1() [*], which guarantees to return a single st

Re: [R] Error generated by nlme::gnls

On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 21:00:25 -0400 Ben Tupper wrote: > Could this be related to a new if() behavior introduced in v4.2.0 ? > See the "SIGNIFICANT USER-VISIBLE CHANGES" for v4.2.0 in the NEWS > > https://cloud.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/NEWS.html No. What's going on is much weirder t

Re: [R] Error generated by nlme::gnls

Could this be related to a new if() behavior introduced in v4.2.0 ? See the "SIGNIFICANT USER-VISIBLE CHANGES" for v4.2.0 in the NEWS https://cloud.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/NEWS.html On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 6:26 PM Aaron Crowley wrote: > > Approximately 6 months ago, I successfully pe

Re: [R] mgcv: relative risk from GAM with distributed lag

Hi Simon and all, I've corrected some mistakes in setting up the prediction data frame (sorry, very stressed and sleep deprived due to closing in deadlines), but am having problems getting the perspective plot using persp(). I've calculated relative risk (RR) but am having trouble getting the per