Re: [R] solving integral equations with undefined parameters using multiroot

2021-05-06 Thread Abbs Spurdle
lm (cl$y ~ cl$x)$coef (Intercept)cl$x 0.1817509 -1.000 On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 1:56 PM Abbs Spurdle wrote: > > #using vF1 function > #from my previous posts > u <- seq (0, 0.25,, 200) > cl <- contourLines (u, u, outer (u, u, vF1),, 0)[[1]] > p

Re: [R] solving integral equations with undefined parameters using multiroot

2021-05-06 Thread Abbs Spurdle
tell me what this line is, or at least a set of > solutions. > > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 5:28 AM Abbs Spurdle wrote: >> >> Just realized five minutes after posting that I misinterpreted your >> question, slightly. >> However, after comparing the solution set

Re: [R] solving integral equations with undefined parameters using multiroot

2021-05-06 Thread Abbs Spurdle
, 2021 at 8:39 PM Abbs Spurdle wrote: > > Hi Ursula, > > If I'm not mistaken, there's an infinite number of solutions, which > form a straight (or near straight) line. > Refer to the following code, and attached plot. > > begin code--- > library (barsurf) > vF1 <-

Re: [R] solving integral equations with undefined parameters using multiroot

2021-05-06 Thread Abbs Spurdle
Hi Ursula, If I'm not mistaken, there's an infinite number of solutions, which form a straight (or near straight) line. Refer to the following code, and attached plot. begin code--- library (barsurf) vF1 <- function (u, v) { n <- length (u) k <- numeric (n) for (i in seq_len (n) )

Re: [R] inverse of the methods function

2021-05-03 Thread Abbs Spurdle
methods (,"glm") On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 10:34 AM Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-help wrote: > > Is there a complement to the methods function, that will list all the defined > methods for > a class?One solution is to look directly at the NAMESPACE file, for the > package that > defines

Re: [R] Package "hse" has been REPLACED by package "dbd".

2021-05-02 Thread Abbs Spurdle
Previously, I disliked some of R's names. e.g. Action of the Toes. But then later realized toes are really important. I don't want to disagree with a 'reviewer'. But I would say subtle references to literature and philosophy demonstrate 'depth'. Was your reviewer a member of the (A)merican