On 6/19/10, Romain Francois wrote:
>
> Le 19/06/10 16:32, Chidambaram Annamalai a écrit :
>>
>> I have written code to compute multi-indices in R [1] and due to the
>> recursive nature of the computation I need to pass around the *same*
>> matrix object (where eac
Doh! I never thought about nesting functions.
Thanks a bunch!
Chillu
On 6/19/10, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 19/06/2010 10:32 AM, Chidambaram Annamalai wrote:
>> I have written code to compute multi-indices in R [1] and due to the
>> recursive nature of the computation I need to
I have written code to compute multi-indices in R [1] and due to the
recursive nature of the computation I need to pass around the *same*
matrix object (where each row corresponds to one multi-index). As pass
by reference wasn't the default behavior I declared a global matrix
(mat) and used the <<-
While this doesn't answer your question, I want to let you know that there
is a proposal for a related improvement within R that will let users compute
(numerically) the derivatives, of any order, of a given function inside of
R. In your case, this means that you will write the smooth spline functi
Thanks!
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Sharpie wrote:
>
>
> Chidambaram Annamalai wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need some help to get some of the object orientation, specifically the
> > methods that overload the basic arithmetic operations, from
Hi,
I need some help to get some of the object orientation, specifically the
methods that overload the basic arithmetic operations, from sample C++
code to R. I don't have experience with such advanced language features
inside of R. So I was wondering if some of you could help me out in this
regar
I tried to shoehorn the read.* functions and match both the fixed width and
the variable width fields
in the data but it doesn't seem evident to me. (read.fwf reads fixed width
data properly but the rest
of the fields must be processed separately -- maybe insert NULL stubs in the
remaining fields a
7 matches
Mail list logo
