t knowing where the simulated values come from, especially if they
> are completely independent of the empirical values, I can't say if this
> approach is wise.
>
> ---
> David L. Carlson
> Department of Anthropology
> Texas A University
>
>
> -Original Mess
:
> On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 22:17 +0100, Fatma Ell wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > I'm trying to use ks.test in order to compare two curve. I've 0 values i
> > think this is why I have the follonwing warnings :impossible to calculate
> > exact exact value with ex-aequos
&
Dear all,
I'm trying to use ks.test in order to compare two curve. I've 0 values i
think this is why I have the follonwing warnings :impossible to calculate
exact exact value with ex-aequos
a=c(3.02040816326531, 7.95918367346939, 10.6162790697674, 4.64150943396226,
1.86538461538462, 1.125,
Hi,
I'm studying occurence of Behavior11, Behavior12,Behavior2,Behavior3 according
three variables :
Times : task time
Time_interval :task time in interval
Frequency:Frequency of the task
For this purpose, I use GLM
attach(datas)
an11=anova(glm(Behavior11 ~ Times + Frequency,
Hi,
I have the following dataset Mesures. It contains test which is a given
context, Space is portion of this following context test. For each test we
have twelve Space and an empirical measure of a behavior Behavior_empirical and
a mesure of simulated behavior Behavior_simulated.
5 matches
Mail list logo