1])
Then I could use p[1] to get my estimated proportion.
Then I used:
ind <- length(attr(p, "warnings"))
print(ind)
if (ind > 0) {msg <- names(warnings()) }
else { msg <- "No warnings" }
overall[1,5] <- msg
to complete my table.
Thanks, again, William!
Jen
Hi William,
Thanks, I'll give that a shot. I tried using withCallingHandlers without
success but II admit I'm not familiar with it and may have used it wrong.
I'll report back.
Jen
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018, 5:42 PM William Dunlap wrote:
> You can capture warnings by using w
d of the function
but they're not being captured like they are when run outside of the
function. Note the 0 output from print(ind) and V7 has "No warnings".
I know a lot of things "behave" differently inside functions. Case in
point, the use
Yay! That worked! Thanks so much!
Jen
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, 9:28 AM David L Carlson wrote:
> Use
>
> plot(NA, xlim=c(0, 5), ylim=c(-35, 35), type="n", axes=FALSE, ann=FALSE)
>
> to set up the length of the y axis instead o
Hi Jim,
Thanks for replying.
Unfortunately, that doesn't work. The axis automatically scales to (-30,
25, by 5).
Jen
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017, 10:09 PM Jim Lemon wrote:
> Hi Jen,
> It seems way too simple, but does this work?
>
> axis(side=2,at=seq(-35,35,by=5),cex.axis=0.7)
reasons, I can't use ggplot or
lattice.
Thanks,
Jen
df <- data.frame(matrix(c(
'18-29','Females', 23.221039,
'30-44','Females', 16.665565,
'45-59','Females', 7.173238,
'60+',
Hi, I'm trying to generate 2.5 million phone numbers. The code below
generates a random sample of 250K MPNS for Morocco. It takes about 10
minutes.
I need to generate 2.5 million. I've run it through once and it took about
45 hours.
Is there a way to speed this up?
Thanks,
Jen
Hi all,
I'm having a problem restructuring my data the way I'd like it. I have data
that look like this:
Candidate.IDSpecialty Office Score
110002 C London 47
110002 C East 48
11
Thanks Patrick - at least I know I wasn't being too silly :-)
Jen
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/studentized-and-standarized-residuals-tp3732997p3733173.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Hi,
I must be doing something silly here, because I can't get the studentised
and standardised residuals from r output of a linear model to agree with
what I think they should be from equation form.
Thanks in advance,
Jennifer
x = seq(1,10)
y = x + rnorm(10)
mod = lm(y~x)
rstandard(mod)
residuals
Hi Bill,
Thanks for your response and I'm sorry -- that was a misleading example of
what I was trying to show. This one should illustrate the point:
require(AER)
data_in = c(0,6,12,18,24,30,36,42,48,54,60,66,72,78)
data_in2 = data_in^2
data_in3 = data_in^3
data_out =
c(139487.00,13.00,62500.00
Hi all,
I have a question about the optimisation methods used in nonlinear
regression. I have some data that I would like to fit a tobit regression
model to (see code below). It seems that the solution is very sensitive to
the initial condition that I give it - is there any option to use a
differen
H Zeileis,
This helped out a lot - thanks!!
Jen
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/tobit-regression-model-tp3345789p3347936.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
Hi,
I'm trying to fit a tobit regression model to some data. When fitting the
exact same data in Stata, I have no problems at all, however R won't
converge. Its not a maxiters thing, since I've tried increasing this
already. I need to be able to fit the model in R since there are users of
the code
Hi,
I am wondering if there is a way to display the full anme of the
regression coeffients/factors in the summary?
Suppose I have a bogus data set using weekday as factor which has 7 levels
such as:
mydata <- sample(364)
wk <- rep(1:7, 52)
weekday <-
factor(wk,1:7,c("Mon","Tue","Wed","Thu"
Hi,
I am wondering if there is a simple way to fix the problem I am having.
For unknown reason, I could not get the full name of the factors to be
printed in the summary. I have tried to used summary.lm as well but the
problem still persists.
SJ$Weekday <-
factor(SJ$Weekday,1:7,c("Mon","Tue
might be useful for this?
Thank you in advance,
Jen
~
Jennifer Maresh, PhD Student
Center for Ocean Health, Long Marine Lab
100 Shaffer Rd.
University of California
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
mar...@biology.ucsc.edu
__
R-help@r-project.org
Hello -
I am attempting to add interaction terms to a model using the gamm
function in the mgcv package. I stripped it down to only two terms to
simplify it. I have no trouble with individual terms, continuous or
factors, nor with interacting factor terms; I cannot, however, figure
out how to add
18 matches
Mail list logo