Hello all,
I am fitting a Gamma distribution to some data I have using nls(). The
function obviously runs into issues when using a 0 as a parameter value. I
understand the line alg = "port" can be used to set the lower bounds to
prevent this from happening. When I run the code I get the following
t; for the secondary axis, which is currently entitled as "c(-100,200)".
> Obviously this isn't very useful.
>
> I will put some reproducible code on the post when it updates.
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
> On Apr 21 2008, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>>On 4
Hello,
How can I label a secondary axis in R? At the moment it's labelled as
c(-100,200). Obviously I would like it to be more sensible.
Here is the code I am using
newx = -100+37.5*((1:9)-1)
axis(4,at=newx,labels=(newx+100)/3750)
Thanks,
Rob
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabb
Hello Ben,
Ok this is going to sound very bizare, but the code now works. I struggled
for a long time to see why it was returning NaN values. I'm sure the code is
exactly the same. But anyway it now seems to be working (for the time
being). Thanks for the input though.
Regards,
Rob
--
View
Hello,
I am working with the nls() function and inserting a formula into it that
use the pweibull function. However the pweibull function is annoyingly
producing NaNs, which nls() refuses to handle. I have put a sample of the
code below. Is there a way to prevent these NaNs from interfering, for
5 matches
Mail list logo