I am interested Andrea is whether you ever established why your R2 was 1.
I have had a similar situation previously.
My main issue though, which I'd be v grateful for advice on, is why I am
obtaining such negative values -0.3 for Somers Dxy using validate.cph from
the Design package given m
Dear R help
My problem is very similar to the analysis detailed here.
If we use the mayo dataset provided with the survivalROC package the estimate
for Somer's Dxy is very negative -0.56.
The Nagelkerke R2 is positive though 0.32.
I know there is a difference between explained variation and predi
2 matches
Mail list logo