>> Is there a way to suppress the output of 'install.packages()'? I have >> seen that the 'download.file' function has a 'quiet' option but I do >> not know how to use it. > > I do not see any good reason to allow that. A user should see if > software is being installed.
Hi Uwe, I have a proposed use-case. We run a series of unit tests in R, and want to plug them into various continuous build/test frameworks. Part of our system involves being able to install packages, so we need to actually run a unit test that uses `install.packages`. For better or worse, many of these depend on parsing the output of a test run; it's a lot of silly work to make them parse the additional `install.packages` output (as opposed to the much simpler `[\w]+: \.+` output from something like testthat in the case of success). Two questions: * Is there another workaround? I'm planning on some ugly hackery on our side to deal with this, but would love something cleaner. * If I were willing to write the patch, would turning these statements into something we could suppress be acceptable for R? Thanks! -cc -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Silencing-the-output-of-install-packages-tp4631947p4635525.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
