I see..
Row1 of Table 2 gives averages for category 3 in the group with a zero in
cols 6-8 AND col 2.
I wanted to averages for category 3 in the group with a zero in cols 6-8 and
a 1 in col 2.
I still think its suspicious that cols V1 and V2 in Table 1 are the same.
--
View this message in conte
Thanks for your reply David.
I didn't realize I could change the title of my post! Haha.
I rather like the example because Table 1 actually appears in Cameron and
Trivedi (potential error and all!).
aperm is not the issue. I am not sure why you get different output, it
should be the case.
Other
Correction, this is not an issue with multilevel, rather a quirk with
aggregate.
Sill looking for help, anyone?
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/multilevel-tp3539421p3540800.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
My code indicates there may be a bug in multilevel.
I doubt this is actually the case, can anyone tell me what is wrong with my
code?
The data file for this code can be downloaded here:
http://cameron.econ.ucdavis.edu/mmabook/mma15p4gev.asc
Here is the code that generates the bug:
rm(list =
4 matches
Mail list logo