Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Re: identical() versus sapply()

2016-04-12 Thread Michael Dewey
have been baffled? John Kane Kingston ON Canada -Original Message- From: r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz Sent: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:34:54 +1200 To: murdoch.dun...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Re: identical() versus sapply() On 12/04/16 14:45, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 11/04/

Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Re: identical() versus sapply()

2016-04-12 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 11/04/2016 11:34 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: On 12/04/16 14:45, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 11/04/2016 10:18 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: "The documentation aims to be accurate, not necessarily clear." !!! I hope that is not the case! Accurate documentation that is confusing is not very useful. I don'

Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Re: identical() versus sapply()

2016-04-12 Thread John Kane
opaque the explanation is. John Kane Kingston ON Canada > -Original Message- > From: r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz > Sent: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:34:54 +1200 > To: murdoch.dun...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Re: identical() versus sapply() > > On 12/04

Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Re: identical() versus sapply()

2016-04-11 Thread Rolf Turner
On 12/04/16 14:45, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 11/04/2016 10:18 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: "The documentation aims to be accurate, not necessarily clear." !!! I hope that is not the case! Accurate documentation that is confusing is not very useful. I don't think it is ever intentionally confusing,

Re: [R] [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Re: identical() versus sapply()

2016-04-11 Thread Rolf Turner
On 12/04/16 13:09, Duncan Murdoch wrote: The documentation aims to be accurate, not necessarily clear. Fortune nomination! cheers, Rolf -- Technical Editor ANZJS Department of Statistics University of Auckland Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276 _