It may be of some comfort to some readers, that I received emails from
two moderators, telling me that I was
I acknowledge that my initial email was a mistake.
However, I need to note recent public comments from the author of the
spatstat package:
Your internet skills are pathetic.
T
> Rolf Turner
> on Thu, 30 Apr 2020 10:42:46 +1200 writes:
> On 30/04/20 12:28 am, Eric Leroy wrote:
>> Dear all, I am sorry to see all the reactions I provoked from a
>> newbie user. Anyway, thank you for the answer I think that the
>> pcf3est function responds to my
On 30/04/20 12:28 am, Eric Leroy wrote:
Dear all, I am sorry to see all the reactions I provoked from a
newbie user. Anyway, thank you for the answer I think that the
pcf3est function responds to my question.
Indeed the spatstat is a very impressive library and I am very grateful to the
the d
Hi Abby,
Once again I must say your form of communication puzzles me. Do you
believe it benefits the open source community to communicate like this?
What about contacting the package maintainer in this way:
"Hi, I was helping someone else using your package to estimate a pair
correlation function
Dear all,
I see two issues here:
1. A new user has a hard time finding and using a specific function in
spatstat. As package authors we are always interested in such reports
and we then try to improve documentation, which is indeed a very
important part of any software project. The package is **v
> suggests that the package isn't fit for CRAN, which I consider a
> direct insult to Adrian and all the hard work he has done
This is my last post on this subject.
I just ran R check on the source package.
After 40 minutes, R check wasn't complete.
And I note the CRAN check results show the pac
NOTE CITATIONS USE BRIEF EXCERPTS
> It's a complaint that no-one responded to your query within 24 hours.
Correction, it wasn't my query.
I was replying to someone else's query.
> Finally, you cast doubt on whether the function pcf3est actually does
> calculate...
You've taken what I said out
I am the main author of spatstat, and the author of the code and documentation
for pcf3est.
This is the first time in 25 years that I can remember anyone complaining about
the documentation for the spatstat package.
The available documentation for spatstat includes:
- welcome
Dear all,
I am sorry to see all the reactions I provoked from a newbie user. Anyway,
thank you for the answer I think that the pcf3est function responds to my
question.
Indeed the spatstat is a very impressive library and I am very grateful to the
the developers.
Best regards
Eric LEROY
Res
I should have noted that my comments weren't directed towards the main
authors, but to all people listed in the description file, which is
many, including some R core members.
Also, overall, I'm impressed by the effort here. It's just I strongly
feel that good documentation is crucial (especially
Hackles down, Rolf... most documentation can benefit from the perspective of a
new user. It would be helpful to link the mention of pp3 to the the pp3
function via hyperlink to help clarify what this argument is supposed to be.
Abby, FWIW I tend to recommend reading the vignettes before trying t
On 29/04/20 10:07 am, Abby Spurdle wrote:
I haven't attempted this.
(Mainly because I'm not familiar with the theory surrounding it).
However, I looked at the documentation for the spatstat package.
There are are several functions prefixed with pcf, including one named pcf3est.
According to i
12 matches
Mail list logo
