Thank you Ivan,
Yes I meant `panel.first`.
I fumbled the title and the examples, but the end result is the same:
```
# Works
with(mtcars, plot(wt, mpg, panel.first = {
arrows(3, 15, 4, 30)
}))
# Doesn't work
plot(mpg ~ wt, data = mtcars, panel.first = {
arrows(3, 15, 4, 30)
})
```
I
В Fri, 05 Jul 2024 14:35:40 +0300
"Erez Shomron" пишет:
> This works as expected:
> with(mtcars, plot(wt, mpg, plot.first = {
> plot.window(range(wt), range(mpg))
> arrows(3, 15, 4, 30)
> }))
I think you meant panel.first, not plot.first. At least I cannot find
any mention of
Thanks for your answer.
Should I report in Bugzilla at least so it's tracked?
I can point that the issue is with line 6 of the function body:
```
dots <- lapply(m$..., eval, md, eframe)
```
I assume the intention was to evaluate the arguments with the context of data
passed to the
That definitely looks like a bug, but not one that anyone will be eager
to fix. It's very old code that tried to be clever, and that's the
hardest kind of code to fix.
Remember Kernighan's Law: "Everyone knows that debugging is twice as
hard as writing a program in the first place. So if
Is the following a bug in your opinion? I think so.
This works as expected:
```
with(mtcars, plot(wt, mpg, plot.first = {
plot.window(range(wt), range(mpg))
arrows(3, 15, 4, 30)
}))
```
This does not.
```
plot(mpg ~ wt, data = mtcars, plot.first = {
plot.window(range(wt),
5 matches
Mail list logo
